Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2030 No Build <br />The 2030 No Build roadway geometry is shown on Figure T5 (Appendix C). This scenario considers 2030 <br />background traffic and 2030 roadway geometry that include programmed improvements. The <br />between existing and 2030 is the addition of Highway Safety Impr <br />improvements at the intersection of TH10 at County Road H. <br />2030 Baseline for the Minimum Development Scenario <br />The 2030 Baseline geometry is shown on Figure T6 (Appendix C). This scenario considers infrastructure <br />improvements at the CR 96 and I-35W interchange, Old Highway 8 a, CR H and I35W <br />interchange, and CR 10 and CR H intersection <br />2030 Baseline for Maximum Development Scenario <br />The infrastructure improvements for this scenario are the same a <br />Traffic Study Area <br />Figure T4(Appendix C)shows the 14 intersections that were analyzed. <br />Local Roadway System Traffic Operations Analysis Methodology <br />The traffic operations analysis for the local roadway system was <br />software program that applies the methodologies of the Highway C <br />evaluate intersection volume/capacity ratio, delay, and level of service, and queuing. Capacity analysis <br />results identify a Level of Service (LOS) which indicates how well an <br />given a ranking from LOS A through LOS F. LOS A indicates the be <br />an intersection that is operating over capacity. LOS A through D <br />hour conditions in an urban area. The traffic operations were an <br />properly identify potential impacts and recommended mitigation m <br />This study used the LOS D/E boundary as an indicator of satisfac <br />displays the LOS thresholds for signalized and unsignalized inte <br /> <br /> <br />April 2014 Draft 25 <br />