Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Figure T15. The improvements that were considered between the baseline ando Build scenarios primarily <br />were discussed previously. Overall the baseline improvements hel <br />better at almost all of the intersections with the exception of <br />the entrance to the AUAR study area site in the AM peak (LOS F). The major movement <br />LOS F is the westbound movements. Due to a high westbound throug <br />traffic conditions deteriorate causing high delays. <br />During the PM peak three intersections are expected to operate a Table 18-5). <br />Maximum Development Scenario <br />The maximum baseline development scenario turning movements were <br />generated traffic to the 2030 No Build scenario turning movement <br />for this scenario are shown in Figure T17. The improvements that were considered between the baseline <br />and No Build scenarios primarily consisted of signalizing the CR-96 and I-35W ramps as well as some <br />geometric changes discussed previously. Similarly to the Minimum <br />intersections that are operating at LOS E or F (see Table 18-5). <br />c.I <br />DENTIFY MEASURES THAT WILL BE TAKEN TO MINIMIZE OR MITIGATE PROJ <br />. <br />EFFECTS <br />Mitigated Roadway Network Scenario Traffic Analyses <br />Minimum Development Scenario Results <br />The analysis for this 2030 Minimum scenario incorporated the 203 <br />following recommended mitigation measures: <br />TH 96 westbound auxiliary lane from east of the project boundary <br />Re-introduction of CR H southbound loop access to I-35W (removed as part of the bas <br />which remains barrier separated from I-35W southbound exit ramp <br />35W after joining the TH 10 southbound access ramp to I-35W southbound. <br />At the I-35W/CR 96 west ramp intersection, an additional southbo <br />At the I-35W/CR 96 east ramp intersection, an additional northbo <br />provide one exclusive left turn lane, one shared left, through, <br />At the intersection of Round Lake Road W at CR 96, the lane use <br />recommended to be modified from an existing shared left/through <br />lane. <br />At the intersection of CR H at TH 10, an additional eastbound le <br />With these mitigation measures incorporated, all intersections w <br />anticipated operational issues in the AM and PM scenarios. The a Table 18- <br />6. <br />Table 18-6. 2030 Minimum Development Scenario Peak Hour Mitigation Traff <br />2030 Baseline Min Mitigated AM 2030 Baseline Min Mitigated PM <br />Intersection <br />LOS LOS <br />Old Hwy 8 and CR 96 C C <br />CR 96 and SB I-35W Ramp C C <br />CR 96 and NB I-35W Ramp B C <br />Round Lake Rd W and CR 96 C C <br /> <br /> <br />April 2014 Draft 31 <br />