Laserfiche WebLink
11.The proposalwill not impact population density on the site. <br />12.The proposed storage tank would be placed within the existing screening fence that is <br />constructed with galvanized chain-link fencing and tan colored slates. The proposed tank <br />would not be taller in height than the existing screening fence. The useas proposedis <br />compatible with other uses and structures on surrounding properties. <br />13.The proposed storage tank is unlikely to significantlyimpact land values on the subject <br />property or on neighboring properties. <br />14.Park dedication requirements do not apply. <br />15.Theproposal is not anticipated to create a negative impact on the immediate area or the <br />community as a whole. <br />16.The proposal does not conflict with the general purpose or intent of the Zoning Ordinance <br />or Comprehensive Plan for the City. <br />Recommendation <br />Based on the submitted plans and the findings of fact, staffrecommendsapprovalof Planning <br />Case 14-012for a Planned Unit Development(PUD) Amendmentat 1887 Gateway Boulevard. <br />Staff recommends the following five (5)conditions be included with the approval: <br />1.That the project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by <br />the conditions of approval.Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City <br />Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. <br />2.That one (1) additional double walled storage tank shall be permitted on the property and <br />installed within the existing screening fence. <br />3.That the storage tank shall be completely concealed behind the screening fence. <br />4.That the storage tankshall meet all applicable Building, Fire and Mechanical Codesand all <br />County and MPCAregulations. The applicant shall obtain all required permits prior to <br />installation. <br />5.That the system tobe installedshall comply with the odor, noise, and other applicable <br />Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regulations. Failure to comply with these regulations <br />may result in a revocation of apermit. <br />Proposed Motion Language <br />1.Recommend Approval with Conditions:Motion to recommend approvalof Planning Case <br />14-012for aPlanned Unit Development Amendmentat 1887 Gateway Boulevardbased on <br />the findings of fact, submitted plans,and thefive (5)conditions in the April 9, 2014, Report <br />to the Planning Commission. <br />2.Recommend Approval as Submitted:Motion to recommend approvalof Planning Case 14- <br />012 for a Planned Unit Development Amendment at 1887 Gateway Boulevard based on the <br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meeting for April 9, 2014 <br />P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-012 -Hood Packaging -PUD Amendment\Memos_Reports_14-012 <br />Page 6of 7 <br />