Laserfiche WebLink
�: <br />� _ <br />f <br />� _ <br />� . <br />; MRS. MCNIESH: No. I do-not. That,was before my time. <br />MAYOR'WOODBURN: Well, at all times, there was another sewer <br />planned. There was never a time when some kind of main wasn't <br />. considered, as going to be necessary. : _ <br />� JEANNE WINIECKI: It seems to me then the area that is going <br />to be assessed hasn't caused the need. <br />MAYOR 4JOORBURN: Th.at is often the case. <br />CHRISTOFFERSEN: Let me say this. At the time that all this <br />action was going on, I don't believe that New Brighton sewer was <br />an issue until - I want to say 1975_, that we became aware that it <br />was available for use, and that New Brighton even wanted the City <br />to use it, and by that time the City was committed to a new line <br />to the south. The City was against using it,at that time because <br />New Brighton didn't have enough capacity in that line, according <br />to them - they only had a small amount - they wanted us to use <br />that small�amount:, but not everything. Since Arden Hills was <br />faced with building that whole line to the south, we thought that <br />was the best way to proceed. It was only in 1980 or 1981 that <br />:New Brighton was able to realize that the capacity of that sewer <br />they had barred Arden Hills, far exceeded what they had planned ` <br />on; so, consequently, they came to us and asked us if we could <br />use that additional capacity. TotaL - look back at the whole thing <br />and had:New Brighton been right at the very beginning, that would <br />'have been the best plan; so, I: think what'we're ending up with is <br />the best plan. <br />MRYOR 6100DBURN; Just a short time more -- if there are.. . <br />are there any comments from any body that hasn't spoken yet? <br />' DON GROWER: I am a planner and I represent the Naegele <br />Companies and their site, and I guess we're only conce,rned that <br />there be some kind of a fair measure of benefit for assessment <br />against the rroperty. Secondly, we would feel that this is kind <br />of an incentive for us to develop some site plans for the develop- <br />ment of the property and we would like the sewer to follaw a <br />pattern that we would 1ay:out. That's our only comments. <br />MAYOR �lOOD6URN: 4ne more. <br />; - . <br />�;� JIM WINIECKI: LJhat is the possibility that this project <br />! could be delayed and new owners consulted. <br />I� MAYOR WOODBURN: That gets to be kind of indefinite, 1ike. <br />the property over here. <br />�i � <br />� JIM WINIECKI: Then, like I said before, we get besieged by <br />i assessments going through us, let's spread this out for more <br />�, people. <br />�I, <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: anything...•one more. <br />, <br />I _ <br />i <br />� 11 - <br />