My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
84-014
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
84-014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2024 11:32:44 AM
Creation date
5/20/2014 10:00:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Resolution 84-014
General - Type
Resolution 84-014
Category
Resolution 84-014
Date
12/31/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />� <br />� . . <br />� <br />F <br />, <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: I don't know how many cvmments we'11 get; <br />we can answer them as we go along. If we get a lot of them, I <br />think maybe we.ca:n answer them as we go along. We have: <br />= don't need it now , <br />�, - wFien wi 11 assessments stop? <br />- have water we're not using <br />- question about Bussard property development <br />- now, Mrs. Winiecki's question <br />Why don't you go ahead with :those, Mr. Christoffersen. <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: Mrs. Winiecki's question. There is a <br />need because of sewers downstream. Yes, they are becoming over- <br />loaded because of the developments north of the freeway. The <br />: sewers south of the freeway were not designed to serve the area <br />: to"the north of �he freeway. At the time the sewers to the south <br />were designed, it was planned to take the sewage from the no.rth to <br />the North Suburban Sanitary District. Also ta include the arsenal. <br />The negotiations that Council made in the past, apparently to go in <br />that direction, fell through;:consequently, at,one time they <br />determined to go south again; take it south through the lower <br />-capacity sewers, and then re-build them when the time came that the <br />: o�ter-sized sewers we:re needed. An investigation was done some <br />.time later, and it was determined, and also during t.he Comprehensive <br />: . P1an Studies completed in the early 80's; New Bri:ghton:has a 42" <br />interceptor not too far away that has excess capacity that can carry` <br />- everything from the north portion of Arden Hi11s. We made an <br />.inxestigation a:nd found 7t more economical to p:ut in the sewe.r as <br />_proposed to New Brighton, than to build new sewer all the way down <br />ta Ros-eville. I hope that explains the need, you have be.en on <br />; sewer I believe for some time; you live on Round:Lake ; you were <br />assessed for sewer in that area in Improvement 12 and 13; when 12 <br />and :13 was built, we also put in the pumping stat.ion and the force <br />main to the south, : <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: May I add to that . Th;is spring we had a <br />rather mild melt of course, of snow. Even�as mild as it was, we <br />had sewage overflow out of some of our manholes down south because <br />of what was coming in from the north; not,far south of where you are. <br />JEANNE WINIECKI: In other words; then, it would benefit the <br />entire community; cause is because of over- developmen,t for the <br />�' <br />sewer lines that affects the south... (inaudible) :seems irrational... <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: That matter was considered_by;the Council... <br />(inaudi,ble) Lets go back to the first question. I guess ybu have: <br />cove:red the need. I frankly don't know'how to answer where does it <br />� stop. I don't know when it ever stops. It seems it never seems <br />to stop. <br />JIM WINIECKI: I don't know.- It does seem like that• We'�re <br />going to pay the brunt on each end. <br />: 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.