Laserfiche WebLink
_ 1 <br />I <br />' I <br />_ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ;_, _r_ � <br />r ; <br />JEAN WINIECKI: Another concern i:s the arsenal wanting City I!� <br />water. Is that going:to be another thing th�t will affect our _ <br />neighborhood`becaus•e'of our proximity to the arsenal. �' <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: = No, it won't be; k�orry not. That one you <br />won't pay for. In fact, you only:can`benefit if it would go throug7''� <br />in your costs, but that's a discussion a little'later tonight. <br />Anything else for th`e moment, Mr.'Christoffersen? <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: As far as the question, How much? I'm ' <br />not Prepared to say how much because the decision hasn't been made. <br />I think Mr. Deans went through the general rates that might be <br />looked at, and>I alluded to the portions that probably would not ' <br />be re a`ssessed. Actually, there are areas along Highway IO at least' <br />the first 200' along Highway 10 that were previously assessed for <br />sewer on a front footage basis'that would probably'not be considered" <br />agai`n as an assessment. It would be the property'more remote from ; <br />the 200', the interior portian, that would be assessed. I`don't � <br />.really know-what the'footage'would be. <br />JEANNE WINIECKI: How would that be assessed front footage when <br />its just acreage? <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN�� The land adjacent to the sewer would be �' <br />'considered the front #ootage - the`200' adjacent to the sewer 1ine; <br />this°area would receive service; property wi11 be closer to'this ; <br />main 1ine. <br />_ _ __ _ , . _ _ _ _ _ <br />I <br />. GEORGE WINIE'C`KI:" I guess:'I'm talking to Mr. Christoffersen '. <br />on those two diagrams.'`(inaudible) It appears that the property ' <br />at 4175 wi11 bear a bulk of the assessment.'` I`t's my feeling that ' <br />possibly'the Council is aware of some things`, down tfiewe tha�t this �'I <br />property'may.`.. sooner or later it's going to develop. I think �, <br />something will happen on it in the not too 'near future.` Is the �, <br />location of thiS sewer line where it should be?` Obviously, you have ; <br />' to look at the proximity of things down there. Are the areas '' <br />, <br />chosen the best choice. <br />MR. GHRISTOFFERSEN: There are two alternate locations t`hat � <br />we looked at - aTong the watermain 1ine, the northerly one along <br />the north of your property. That was a difficult dec7sion when <br />we pu't the water line'in. It was felt by the adjacent property <br />owners that th`ere might be a road in that general location, ! <br />possibly extended through to 14ih Street to 'make a connection. � <br />That is one location. The southerly one you notice`on the draw- i <br />ing, is the one along`the freeway following the most shallow land <br />i <br />that we could �o get around. Obviously:, if the program were - ; <br />undertaken, it' would be in the` best efforts to find out from the <br />property owners their best guess as to where to put the'1ine: � ', <br />Obviovsly, we would not want to put it right through a building ' <br />we would want to locate it where it's most practical. I think I <br />we're looking at, on the northerly side of your particular pro- , <br />perty that's the deepest, I be1ieve, and as you'`come down it '� <br />probably falls off to the south. It gets shallower.and shallower. i <br />: 6 <br />' <br />_ _ . _ . , .�. __ , I <br />