My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
84-014
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
84-014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2024 11:32:44 AM
Creation date
5/20/2014 10:00:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Resolution 84-014
General - Type
Resolution 84-014
Category
Resolution 84-014
Date
12/31/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� _ , . <br />i' - <br />� <br />It's the shallowest at the south end of your property. As far as <br />individual property, if it can possibly be worked out, I think it <br />would be the intention and desire to fit into that. <br />� GEORGE WINIECKI: A1ong the southerly edge, granted, it <br />- would be easier for them to put it in, but again all the burden <br />` of the assessmen� is pushed over on that piece of property. I <br />guess what I want made clear is that the north is gaining from <br />something on that's going to the southern part of the Village. <br />You've got to be fair in what the costs should be to the property <br />owners. <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: I can assure you that fair_is what we want <br />to be. I know you don't mean that we aren't, but none-the-less <br />that too is why we are listening here, to see what can be done,� <br />MR. CHRISTOFfERSEN: There is obviously a two-sided frontage <br />on the north; there is only one-sided on the south. In either case <br />the frpntage would be essentially assessed against your property. <br />I suspect.it would be about the same, whether it is at the north <br />flr the south. Obviously, the total cost of the improvement has <br />someth,ing to do with the rate. - <br />GEORGE.WINIECKI: I'm looking at too - you have two big <br />easements running down that,north and south lines:of �he property. <br />MR.`CHRISTOFFERSEN: As.I recall, there is a 20' easement on <br />the north. <br />� � GEORGE WINIECKI: Right down the center, l0 on each side. <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: If there were something built to the <br />sou,th, and the sewer was eonstructed to the south, T would assume <br />that there wo:uld be a 20' - 30' easement over �o that sewer, where- <br />ever it might be. <br />GEORGE WINIECKI,: Is there another alternative? <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: Pdot that I know of. Like I say we did <br />investigate going to the south.� There was the other alternative of <br />leaving the lift station and constructing less shallow sewers, <br />pumping across tfie other direction to the west, but by the time <br />you put sewers and feeding back gravity se.wers to get back to the <br />lift station, the lift station operation over a period of time it <br />- was found to be more economical to spend the capital up front and <br />get rid of the long-time operation of the one lift station because <br />they are expensive to operate. <br />�; MAYOR WOODBURN: The Council has been working on this with <br />� Mr. Ghristoffersen 3 to 5 years, I think; it feels 1ike. I don't <br />know exactly how 1ong, but we have had many reports on it and <br />finally ordered the feasibi1ity study on this north section be- <br />cause it turned out to be the best - cheapest. Any further <br />comments? _ <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.