|
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL APRIL 28, 20149
<br />
<br />the Gateway 2nd Addition, based on the submitted plans and the findings of
<br />fact, as amended by the four (4) conditions in the April 28, 2014, Report to the
<br />City Council. The motion carried (5-0).
<br />
<br />9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />A.Round Lake Road Bids
<br /> Resolution 2014-023 Cost to Be Assessed
<br /> Resolution 2014-024 Setting Date for Assessment Hearing
<br />
<br />Assistant City Engineer Anderson
<br />reported that as per Council direction, bids were opened on
<br />Thursday, April 17, 2014, for the Round Lake Road, Gateway Boulevard and Gateway Court
<br />name and their total bid.
<br />
<br />Meyer Contracting, Inc. $1,766,605.41
<br />Valley Paving, Inc. $1,826,883.05
<br />Northwest Asphalt $1,881,398.19
<br />Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. $1,882,203.00
<br />North Valley Inc. $1,929,408.71
<br />Carl Bolander & Sons, Co. $1,931,081.20
<br />T.A. Schifsky and Sons, Inc. $2,045,093.60
<br />ASTECH, Corp. $2,073,963.39
<br />
<br />Assistant City Engineer Anderson
<br />indicated that the total project cost is $2,485,247.71, which
<br />Assessment Policy and the cost of street lighting to be installed by Xcel Energy. The 2014 Capital
<br />Improvement Plan (CIP) estimated the total project cost at $2,627,650.00; however that estimate
<br />included $500,000.00 for sanitary sewer in Round Lake Road anticipating the elimination of lift
<br />station #11 which was subsequently determined to not be cost effective. The CIP estimate did not
<br />include the mill and overlay of either Gateway Boulevard or Gateway Court which are both
<br />included in the total bid. Also, included in this bid is the replacement of the MnDOT fencing
<br />(2,600 linear feet) on the interstate side of Round Lake Road and the directional boring of the
<br />replacement water main in order to minimize disruption to the businesses. Finally, the total project
<br />cost includes Xcel Energy installed lighting on Round Lake Road and Gateway Boulevard.
<br />
<br />Assistant City Engineer Anderson
<br />stated that an analysis of the low bid received relative to the
<br />assessment scenario laid out in the Feasibility Report yields an assessment rate of $191.25 per
<br />front foot; just slightly less than the $193.00 estimated in the Feasibility Report. This rate is based
<br />reconstruction projects.
<br />
<br />Assistant City Engineer Anderson
<br />commented that in order to move the project forward, it
<br />would be appropriate for the Council to consider adopting two resolutions. The first, Resolution
<br />2014-023, Declaring the Cost to be Assessed and Ordering the Preparation of the Assessment
<br />Roll; and the second, is Resolution 2014-024, Setting the Date for the Assessment Hearing as
<br />May 12, 2014.
<br />
|