Laserfiche WebLink
9. Baseline Roadway Network Scenario Analyses <br />a. Minimum Development Scenario <br />The minimum baseline development scenario turning movements were generated by adding the site <br />generated traffic to the 2030 No Build traffic volumes.These turning movement traffic volumes are <br />Figure T15 <br />shown in .The improvements that were considered between the baseline and no build <br />scenarios primarily were discussed previously. Overall the baseline improvements helped the system <br />maintain an LOS D or better at almost all of the intersections with the exception of theCR96/ TCAAP <br />Property access in the AM peak (LOS F). The major movement contributing to the LOS F is the <br />westbound movements. Due to a high westbound through volume and alack of capacity, the traffic <br />conditions deteriorate causing high delays. <br />During the PM peak three intersections are expected to operate at LOS E or LOS F. Which are <br />further described below: <br /> Old Hwy 8 and CR-96 <br /> The traffic volumes on the southbound left and northbound right cause significant <br />o <br />delays and impact the overall LOS at the intersection. These movements are both <br />operating at an unacceptable LOS. <br />CR-96 and TCAAP Property/North Heights Church Access <br /> Similarly to the AM peak the WB through movement demand exceeds capacity <br />o <br />causing major delays for westbound traffic. <br />CR-H and US-10 <br /> The high demands on the northbound through movements and the westbound <br />o <br />movements are causing high delays and queues that affect the overall LOS of the <br />intersection. <br />Table 7 <br />The delays and LOS for this scenario can be seen in below. <br />TCAAP Traffic Analysis <br />Technical Memorandum 17 March 2014 <br />