My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-28-14-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
07-28-14-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2014 11:43:40 AM
Creation date
7/25/2014 11:42:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
282
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION –June 4, 20147 <br />Commissioner Bartelmoved and Commissioner Holewaseconded a motion to table action <br />on Planning Case 14-017 for aVariance at 3441 Lake Johanna Boulevardto allow for <br />further examination of the request by the applicant and staff. <br />City Planner Streff <br />requested the Commission provide staff comment on what setbacks would <br />be acceptable. <br />Chair Larson <br />believed that eight inches was not a desirable setback. He stated he could <br />entertain a lesser setback than 30 feet;however, the size of the structure should not be overly <br />expanded. He recommended a reasonable setback from Fairview be created. <br />Commissioner Bartel <br />agreed stating the size of the garage was more of a concern than the <br />setbacks. <br />The motion carried unanimously (6-0). <br />B.Planning Case 14-019;Zoning Code Amendment –Lighting Regulations–Not a <br />Public Hearing <br />Associate Planner Bachler <br />stated that the 2014 Planning Commission Work Plan was discussed <br />and adopted at the March 17, 2014, City Council Work Session. One of the items on the plan <br />concerns light-emitting diode (LED) lighting. Compared to incandescent lighting, LED lights <br />produce a greater amount of luminosity, or brightness. The City Council asked staff to review the <br />City’s existing regulations on lighting and to update relevant ordinances if necessary to address <br />the potential impacts associated with brighter LED lights. This memo provides an overview of <br />the sections in the Zoning Code that regulate lighting and also discusses ideas for additional <br />regulations that could be considered. Based on the direction provided by the Planning <br />Commission, staff will draft an ordinance that would amend the Zoning Code to update the <br />City’s lighting regulations. <br />Associate Planner Bachler <br />indicated that provisions on lighting are generally confined to <br />Section 1325.05 Design Standards in the Zoning Code. Lighting is required to be directed away <br />from adjacent lots and streets and the source of illumination must be controlled in such a way <br />that light is only directed onto the site. The Zoning Code restricts light trespass by stipulating that <br />light cast onto adjacent travel lanes or roadways cannot exceed 1.0 foot candle and 0.4 foot <br />candles on adjoining residential properties. No morethan 25 percent of non-residential façades <br />that are visible from residential properties can be illuminated by direct light from a source such <br />as a flood light. <br />Associate Planner Bachler <br />indicated that Section 1320 District Regulations includes special <br />requirements for specific districts in the City. The Neighborhood Business, B-4 Retail Center, <br />Gateway Business, and Civic Center Districts all have special requirements regarding lighting <br />that go beyond the provisions in Section 1325.05: <br />•In the Neighborhood Business District, accent lighting is only permitted when <br />used to delineate the main entrance into a building. Parking lot lighting is <br />restricted to a maximum of 14 feet in height. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.