08-18-14-WS - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

DRAFT August 13, 2014 Table 3-3: Administrative Modifications Table Code Standard Extent of Administrative Modification Criteria Permitted Frontage requirement along one Pedestrian Priority designated frontage may be replaced with the Reduction of building frontage corresponding standard for Pedestrian-Friendly frontage requirements for lots with two or more designation instead. In determining which Pedestrian Pedestrian Priority frontages (applicable Priority frontage may be changed to a Pedestrian-Friendly Frontage Standard for the zoning district frontage, precedence shall be given to matching any of the subject corner lot) existing building Pedestrian Priority frontages of adjoining blocks or lots on either side of the street. c. Corner Lot Building Frontage Frontage requirement along one Pedestrian-Friendly Reduction of building frontage designated frontage may be replaced with the requirements for lots with two or more corresponding standard for General frontage designation Pedestrian-Friendly frontages instead. In determining which Pedestrian-Friendly frontage (applicable Frontage Standards for the may be changed to a General frontage, precedence shall designated zoning district of the subject be given to matching any existing building Pedestrian- corner lot) Friendly frontages of adjoining blocks or lots on either side of the street. Sidewalks, street tree planting, street Any changes to the streetscape standards shall be based d. Sidewalk and lighting, and other streetscape standards on specific development context such as existing vegetation, Streetscape may be adjusted based on the natural features, drainage, and fire access and is subject to standards development context and street cross approval by the JDA. section. Reduction in the number of parking spaces shall be based on one or more of the following: i. A shared parking plan for parking within 1,320 feet e. Required Parking Reduction in the number of required of the subject property; or Spaces parking spaces ii. A parking study for the uses proposed on the site; or iii. A combination of the above 3. Other ii. A modification of a numerical standard is needed to a. Any other numerical A modification up to 10% (increase or accommodate existing conditions. standard in the code decrease) iii. The proposed development still meets the intent of the Code. i. Phased developments may defer building frontage b. Phased Deferment of building frontage requirements as long as they meet the build-to-zone Developments standards and parking setback requirements (e)Major Modifications and City Council Review: The City Council shall review projects that request a Major Modification from any standard in the TRC beyond Administrative Modifications authorized above (see Figure 3-1 and Table 3-3). A Community Development staff report and recommendation is required for a Major Modification request to be heard by City Council. City Council shall provide recommendation for approval to JDA. Any denial by City Council shall not be delivered to JDA, and applicant must reapply to seek major modifer plan revisions. Public notices shall be issued for all Major Modification hearin i. Review Considerations for Major Modifications - In reviewing any Major Modification request to standards in this Code, the City Council shall use the following criteria: 1. The goals, intent and vision of the adopted TCAAP Master Plan and City of Arden Hills Comprehensive Plan; TCAAP Redevelopment Code Page | 15