Laserfiche WebLink
<br />west into the street, which is also not in conformance as we have a separate driveway <br />connecting to our attached garage. <br /> <br />The proposed reconstruction plan <br />As described in the project summary, we are proposing to reconstruct a detached <br />garage where the existing structure is located with two modifications: (a) rotate the new <br />structure by 15o to align it with our house, and (b) increase the footprint from 22’ x 22’ to <br />26’ x 24’ to allow for reasonable use of this garage (see attached site survey with <br />proposed footprint). The rotation is for aesthetic reasons to ensure the garage wall and <br />rooflines match the angle of our house and are parallel to the street. We are proposing <br />to increase the footprint to allow for reasonable use of our property. Since our property <br />includes lakeshore frontage on Lake Johanna, we and future owners of our property <br />have storage needs associated with our use and maintenance of our lakeshore <br />property. At the time the original garage was built, a 22 ft. garage may have <br />accommodated most boats in common use at the time, but today, boats greater than 20 <br />ft. in length are quite commonly used on lakes lik e Lake Johanna and garage stalls of <br />~23-25 ft. can be required to accommodate such boats (extra space for platforms, <br />trailer, etc). Thus, boat storage in addition to space for other recreational vehicles (e.g. <br />kayaks, canoes, bikes), equipment (e.g. dock sections), and standard yard maintenance <br />equipment, necessitate larger than a 22’x22’ structure. We feel strongly that the <br />character of our city benefits when boats and other equipment associated with lake <br />living are stored inside as opposed to on yards or in alleys. We propose to build a <br />garage that is large enough to accommodate these items, wh ich we consider <br />reasonable use of our lakeshore property and suspect that future owners of our home <br />will share this perspective. <br />The combination of the proposed modifications to the footprint will require an <br />additional 2 ft. encroachment into our south side yard setback relative to the current <br />structure. We are not able to move the garage further to the north to avoid this <br />encroachment or the detached structure will be less than 6 ft. from our house, which is <br />not in conformance. Aside from the setbacks, the garage will conform to all other zoning <br />requirements: average roof mid-peak height will be less than 15 ft, landscape <br />percentage of lot will remain >65%, garage floor area will be less than 728 ft2, and the <br />garage doors of the proposed garage will face our current driveway instead of directly <br />accessing the street. <br />We are working with the original builder of the home, Zawadski Homes, and an <br />architect who helped in the design of the original house, NRDI. Plans for the new <br />garage are complete (see attached drawing) and were custom designed to match the <br />architecture of the house as well as the specific construction materials: the proposed <br />roof pitch is 6:12 just as for the house, HardieBoard fiber cement siding of the same <br />color will be used, roofing to match the house, and windows of the same style on all four