My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-9-14-PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2010-2019
>
PC Packets 2014
>
07-9-14-PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2015 3:33:34 PM
Creation date
9/22/2014 3:20:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meeting for July 9, 2014 <br /> <br />P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2014\PC 14-020 - Variance - 3200 Lake Lane\Memo_Reports_14-020 <br /> <br />Page 4 of 10 <br /> <br />The existing detached accessory structure is considered a nonconforming structure <br />because of its location within the forty (40) foot designated setback for a through-lot 1 <br />determined as properties along Lake Lane have varying setback encroachments and <br />principal and accessory structure orientation. The existing accessory structure <br />encroaches thirty (30) feet into the secondary front yard setback, leaving a setback of ten <br />(10) feet from the east property line. The existing accessory structure does not encroach <br />into either side yard setback on the property. The Zoning Code permits detached <br />accessory structures within this district; however, they are not permitted within the <br />designated setbacks for a through-lot. <br />. In <br />this case, staff has not determined that one of the front yards is in fact a rear yard based <br />on the Through-Lot criteria. New setbacks requirements for this property were not <br /> <br />As indicated by the applicant, the proposed accessory structure would encroach twenty <br />(20) feet into the secondary front yard setback. This would leave a setback of twenty <br />(20) feet from the east property line. The proposed structure would increase the footprint <br />of the existing detached garage from sixteen and one half (16.5) feet by twenty-two and <br />one half (22.5) feet to twenty (20) feet by twenty-four (24) feet. This would be an <br />increase of 108.75 square feet. <br /> <br />C. Lot Coverage – Variance Required <br /> <br />The existing and proposed lot coverage both exceed the lot coverage limitations of the R- <br />2 Zoning District. The maximum lot coverage for impervious surfaces is 35% and the <br />minimum landscape coverage is 65%. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 Through-Lot: <br />A lot that has a pair of opposite lot lines abutting two (2) substantially parallel streets, <br />and which is not a corner lot. On a through-lot, the determination of whether the street <br />frontage is to be considered a front yard or rear yard shall be as subject to the provisions <br />in the Zoning Code. <br /> <br />The Zoning Administrator may determine that one of the front yards may be deemed a <br />rear yard and shall determine appropriate rear yard setback regulations. Factors to be <br />considered shall include topography, location of structures on the lot, location of <br />structures on adjacent lots, and the type of streets or thoroughfares abutting the lot.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.