07-9-14-PC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Analysis of Hardship Criteria: A specific response to each hardship criterion is included below: 1. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. Given that the existing garage is non-conforming, any change to the structure would not be allowed by official controls. Furthermore, the unique topology of our lot severely limits the practicality of any conforming arrangement of the detached structure , so it would not be reasonable to reconstruct this garage in a conforming location. We are proposing the following changes: a rotation of the garage to align it with our house and move the garage doors off the street , shifting of the structure by 26” to the east and 12” to the north to reduce the encroachment into the front and side -yard setbacks, a small expansion of the eaves to match the look of our house, and a change from a 10/12 roof pitch to a 6/12 roof pitch (to match the house) with a ~1 ft. increase in the peak height of the building. The current garage footprint is not aligned with our house and the roof pitch does not match and thus, will significantly detract from the site’s aesthetics if it were to be reconstructed as is. The eaves of the current structure are quite small (2 in. on east/west, 7 in. on north/south), which currently results in improper drainage of rainwater off the roof down the walls of the buildi ng, and also do not match the aesthetic of our house. Regarding the height of the building, we are adding approximately 1 foot to the peak height of the building to accommodate room for storage in the attic. With the extra foot, the average height in the storage area (see drawing) would be ~5’ 3” as compared to an average height of ~4’ 5”, which would make this area much more functional in terms of access to the storage space. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the proper ty not created by the landowner. Our situation is the result of three factors: location and condition of the existing detached garage, the relative location of the house to the detached structure, and t he steep incline (26 ft.) of our lot from the west to east property lines. We had no role in creating any of these circumstances. 3. The deviation from the Ordinance with any attached conditions will still be in keeping wi th the spirit and intent of the Ordinance. We believe the proposed variance preserves the spirit and intent of the Ordinance. We are proposing relatively modest changes to the existing garage structure that will result in a substantially more functional garage that allows for reasonable use of our property for us and any future owners. The end product will be an aesthetically pleasing garage with high-quality construction that blends in with and raises the ch aracter of our neighborhood with little to no negative impact on our own or our neighbo rs’ property.