|
1. Barbara J. Lipman et al., Paycheck to Paycheck: Working Families and the Cost of
<br />Housing in America (Washington, D.C.: Center for Housing Policy/National
<br />Housing Conference, 2001).
<br />2. Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University, The State of the
<br />Nation’s Housing: 2002 (Cambridge: Joint Center for Housing Studies of
<br />Harvard University, 2002).
<br />3. Income groups are according to U.S. Census Bureau definitions.
<br />4. Alastair Smith, Mixed-Income Housing Developments: Promise and Reality.
<br />(Cambridge: Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard
<br />University/Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation, 2002).
<br />5. Jo Allen Gause et al., Great Planned Communities (Washington, D.C.: ULI–the
<br />Urban Land Institute, 2002).
<br />6. “Mixing Housing Types in TNDS,” New Urban News,May/June 2000, p.10.
<br />7. Community Partners, National Trust for Historic Preservation, Sweet
<br />Auburn Case Study at www.nationaltrust.org/community_partners/
<br />sweet_auburn. html.
<br />8. Paul C. Brophy and Rhonda N. Smith, “Mixed-Income Housing: Factors
<br />for Success,” Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research (3) 2,
<br />1997, p. 27.
<br />9. Diane Suchman, Mixed-Income Housing,ULI Research Working Paper
<br />Series #643, 1995, p. 3.
<br />10. William P. Macht, “Mountain Urbanism: Resort Neighborhood
<br />Creates Affordability Without Income Limits,” Urban Land,
<br />November/December 2001.
<br />11. Belle Creek, Commerce City, Colorado: ULI Development Case Study C032016.
<br />12. Association of Bay Area Governments, Theory in Action: S.M.A.R.T. Growth
<br />Case Studies in the San Francisco Bay Area and Around the Nation, 2001,
<br />www.abag.ca.gov/planning/theoryia/houssanrafael.htm.
<br />13. Massachusetts Housing Partnership,www.mhp.net.
<br />14. Citizens’ Housing and Planning Association, Massachusetts and Chapter 40B,
<br />February 2001, www.mhp.net/termsheets/40BQA.pdf.
<br />15. David Rusk, “Inclusionary Zoning: Living—And Learning—Together;
<br />Appendix B.” Remarks to Florida Housing Coalition, October 23,2001;
<br />www.gamliel.org.
<br />16. Ibid.
<br />17. Karen Destorel Brown, Expanding Affordable Housing Through Inclusionary
<br />Zoning: Lessons From the Washington Metropolitan Area (Washington, D.C.:
<br />The Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy,
<br />2001), p. 2.
<br />18. Kim Ilana Marschner, Building Workforce Housing: Meeting San Francisco’s
<br />Housing Challenge (San Francisco: San Francisco Chamber of
<br />Commerce, 2003).
<br />19. ULI–Urban Land Institute, Engaging the Private Sector in HOPE VI
<br />(Washington, D.C.: ULI–the Urban Land Institute, 2002).
<br />20. Deborah L. Myerson, “The Income Mix.” Urban Land,May 2002.
<br />21. Patrick O’Toole, “The Public Land Connection,” Professional Builder,
<br />August 2000.
<br />22. Roger Galatas (president and CEO, Roger Galatas Interests, LLC), personal
<br />communication; March 2003.
<br />23. Affordable Housing Design Advisor,www.designadvisor.org.
<br />24. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development/Congress for the
<br />New Urbanism, Principles for Inner City Neighborhood Design: HOPE VI and the
<br />New Urbanism (San Francisco: Author, 2000). p. 34.
<br />25. ULI–Urban Land Institute, Engaging the Private Sector in HOPE VI.
<br />26. Nava Adé, Santa Fe, New Mexico: ULI Development Case Study #C032014.
<br />27. Lipman et al., Paycheck to Paycheck.
<br />28. Colorado Sprawl Action Center,www.sprawlaction.org/halloffame/
<br />EStapleton.html.
<br />29. Richard M. Haughey, ULI Land Use Policy Forum Report: Challenges to
<br />Developing Workforce Housing (Washington, D.C.: ULI–the Urban Land
<br />Institute, 2002).
<br />30. Joseph E. Corcoran, “Making Mixed-Income Housing Work,” Multifamily
<br />Trends,Summer 2002.
<br />31. For a more comprehensive discussion of federal, state, and local programs
<br />to support the production of affordable and mixed-income housing, see
<br />National Association of Home Builders–Economics, Mortgage Finance, and
<br />Housing Policy Division, Producing Affordable Housing: Partnerships for Profit
<br />(Washington, D.C.: Home Builder Press, 1999); or the Policy Link Equitable
<br />Development Tool Kit, www.policylink.org.
<br />32. Michael Bodaken and Anne Heitlinger, “Providing Affordable Housing.”
<br />Planning Commissioners Journal, No. 45, Winter 2002, p. 2.
<br />33.Edmonton Housing Trust Fund, www.ehtf.ca.
<br />34.Jamie Ross and Mark Hendrickson, “2001 Housing Legislative Wrap Up,”
<br />Housing News Network: The Journal of the Florida Housing Coalition, Inc.,
<br />Summer 2001.
<br />35. Brophy and Smith, “Mixed-Income Housing: Factors for Success,” p. 24.
<br />36. Multnomah County Library, www.multcolib.org/news/2002/hwdreopen.html.
<br />37. Shiels Obletz Johnsen, www.sojpdx.com/hollywood.html.
<br />38. Paul Cummings and John Landis, Relationships between Affordable Housing
<br />Developments and Neighboring Property Values (Berkeley: University of
<br />California Institute of Urban & Regional Development, 1993).
<br />39. Maxfield Research, Inc., A Study of the Relationship Between Affordable Family
<br />Rental Housing and Home Values in the Twin Cities (Minneapolis: Family
<br />Housing Fund, 2000).
<br />40.Joyce Siegel, The House Next Door (Baltimore: Innovative Housing Institute,
<br />1998).
<br />41.Edward Goetz et al., There Goes the Neighborhood?(Minneapolis: Center for
<br />Urban and Regional Affairs, University of Minnesota, 1996).
<br />42. Richard K. Green, Stephen Malpezzi, and Kiat-Ying Seah, Low-Income Housing
<br />Tax Credits: Housing Development and Property Values (Madison: Center for
<br />Urban Land Economics Research, University of Wisconsin, 2002), p. 4.
<br />43. National Association of Home Builders, Market Outlook: Confronting the Myths
<br />about Apartments with Facts (Washington D.C.: NAHB, November 2001), p. 4.
<br />44. Affordable Housing Design Advisor, available at www.designadvisor.org/
<br />gallery/reservoir.html.
<br />45. Maxfield Research, A Study of the Relationship Between Affordable Family Rental
<br />Housing and Home Values in the Twin Cities [Summary of Findings].Prepared
<br />for the Family Housing Fund (Minneapolis: Maxfield Research, 2000).
<br />46. Planning and Conservation League/PCL Foundation, Why Should
<br />Environmentalists Support Quality Affordable Housing?, 2000,
<br />www.pcl.org/Land%20Use/housing.html.
<br />23
<br />Notes
|