Laserfiche WebLink
Growing Closer 1 <br />about density, there is a growing realization that design and <br />planning are at the heart of the issue—that people’s attitudes, <br />pro and con, reflect the quality of the housing around them, <br />rather than the concept of density (Oppenheimer 2006). Many <br />Oregonians now recognize they need to determine why some <br />density appeals, while other density disappoints, so they can <br />learn to do it better. <br />Which is what this book is all about—showing density and <br />the design behind it to help you decide what works and what <br />doesn’t. When you examine the many ways to achieve density, <br />you can begin to understand how different design approaches <br />create different results. <br />Chapter 2 presents “Patterns of Density,” a selection of <br />photographs that illustrate the points made in this introduction. <br />The accompanying images show examples of monotony, diver- <br />sity, amenities, open space, and other elements to demonstrate <br />how they contribute to or detract from an environment. They <br />highlight the differences among various planning and design <br />strategies, showing how town and neighborhood layout, build- <br />ing design, and landscaping affect the quality of living spaces. <br />Chapter 3 is a “Density Catalog.” This collection of neigh- <br />borhood photographs represents a broad sampling of density <br />at many levels, from rural low to urban high. It will help you <br />get a feel for what different densities look like. And it will show <br />how design, much more than density, is what shapes the physi- <br />cal character of a place. <br />Density increases the need to formalize and strengthen our <br />connection to nature. Just as all cities need infrastructure in <br />the form of roads, pipes, and wires, healthy cities need a green <br />infrastructure. Such a system of open spaces and natural ele- <br />ments would reach into every neighborhood. Green infrastruc- <br />ture could include natural features like riparian stream edges <br />and wooded tracts, but it also might contain formal elements <br />like pocket parks and tree-lined boulevards. The greenspace <br />system should weave through town, offering every resident a <br />direct connection to nature and natural processes. Trees, which <br />fit in the smallest of spaces, play an indispensable role. Green <br />infrastructure offers many environmental benefits—cleaner <br />air, better water quality, cooler summer temperatures—but the <br />main advantage is that it provides an element of tranquility <br />to areas of high activity. It satisfies a human need that is often <br />denied in urban life. <br />In dense neighborhoods, architectural design matters <br />down to the last detail of construction. It is just as important <br />to add sound insulation to apartment walls as it is to build a <br />parking garage. High ceilings add a sense of spaciousness.Large <br />windows let in more daylight. A balcony offers a place to eat <br />outdoors. One large tree in the back patio can make the neigh- <br />bors seem twice as far away. Shielded streetlights help keep the <br />night sky dark. Living close together should not mean saying <br />goodbye to privacy and quiet. <br /> <br />viSuaLizing denSiT y <br />Americans will be wrestling with issues of growth and den- <br />sity for generations. We are growing rapidly and are not sure <br />we want to continue to sprawl. We can learn something from <br />Oregon, a state that chose density 30 years ago. After decades of <br />brisk growth and a land use policy mandating density, the state <br />has experienced both successes and failures. Compared to other <br />regions, sprawl has been curtailed and open land protected. But <br />Oregonians give mixed reviews of the density they’re now liv- <br />ing in. Some love it; others are skeptical. In the public dialogue <br />■