Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL— SEPTEMBER 29, 2014 8 <br /> 5. The proposed accessory structure is setback fifty-eight (58) feet from the front property <br /> line and twenty-eight(28) feet from the southern side yard. <br /> 6. The structure does not encroach into a front, side or rear yard setback. <br /> 7. The proposed structure and landscaping coverages are within the zoning district <br /> requirements. The new structure will increase the lot coverage from 5.36% to 6.62% and <br /> decreases the landscaping coverage from 94.64%to 93.38%. <br /> 8. The proposed accessory structure would not exceed fifteen(15) feet in height. <br /> 9. Detached accessory structures up to seven hundred and twenty-eight (728) square feet are <br /> permitted structures within the R-1 Zoning District. <br /> 10. All structures on the lot are outside of the 100-year flood plain, wetlands, and easements. <br /> 11. The proposal is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as the <br /> Ordinance generally allows flexibility for unique parcels and situations when impacts to <br /> surrounding properties are minimized. <br /> 12. The proposal is consistent with the Arden Hills Comprehensive Plan as it allows the <br /> reasonable use of residential property. <br /> 13. Detached accessory structures are permitted and a reasonable use within the R-1 Single <br /> Family Residential Zoning District. <br /> 14. The property is rather unique due to the placement of the existing single family dwelling in <br /> the rear of the lot approximately two-hundred(200) feet from the front property line. <br /> 15. The current placement of the single family dwelling leaves limited options for the <br /> construction of an accessory structure that meets all setback regulations and minimizes <br /> tree loss and final grading. <br /> 16. The proposed accessory structure would be visible from neighboring properties; however, <br /> the proposed location, design and the use of quality materials for the detached structure <br /> that are compatible in appearance to the single family dwelling should minimize the <br /> impacts on surrounding property owners. <br /> 17. The proposed accessory structure is unlikely to have negative impacts to the property or to <br /> the neighborhood as a whole. <br /> City Planner Streff stated that the property is fairly unique when compared to other properties in <br /> Arden Hills. Because of the lot's topography, natural drainage pattern, significant trees, and the <br /> configuration of the principal structure at the rear of the lot, options for the movement of the <br /> accessory structure to an area that meets all zoning regulations are very limited. Due to the scope <br /> of the project and the proposed addition of an accessory structure, the character of the <br /> neighborhood or the City is not expected to be negatively affected. <br /> City Planner Streff explained that the property owner is proposing to construct the new driveway <br /> and parking area in front of the garage with a gravel or rock material. Knowing that the majority <br /> of driveway and parking areas on the lot are not currently improved with a hard surface, it was <br /> determined that any new areas should be improved with a hard surface as indicated in condition <br /> number 5. The Code states in Section 1325.06 that off-street parking areas and drives shall be <br /> improved with a hard surface and prohibits parking of vehicles on any area of the property except <br /> on a designed driveway or parking area. <br /> City Planner Streff reported the findings of fact for the site plan review support a <br /> recommendation for approval. However, if the City Council chooses to make a recommendation <br /> for denial, the findings of fact would need to be amended to reflect the reasons for the denial. <br />