Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – October 8, 2014 8 <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler commented that the Planned Unit Development process is a tool that <br />provides additional flexibility for development that an underlying zoning district would not <br />otherwise allow. For example, a PUD may make exceptions to setbacks, lot coverage, parking <br />requirements, signage, building materials, or landscaping requirements. It is intended to <br />overcome the limitations of zoning regulations and improve the overall design of a project. <br />While the PUD process allows the City to negotiate certain aspects of the development, any <br />conditions imposed on the PUD must have a rational basis related to the expected impact of the <br />development. A PUD cannot be used to permit uses that would not otherwise be permitted in the <br />underlying zoning district. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler stated that in the original Master PUD approval, the City granted <br />Presbyterian Homes flexibility in terms of building height and density. The maximum building <br />height in the R-4 District is 35 feet and the Lakeview Building was permitted to be constructed at <br />an average height of 46 feet above grade. Prior to receiving approval of the Master PUD, the <br />Johanna Shores facility operated under two Conditional Use Permits, which granted approval for <br />a net density of 17.6 units per acre on the property. The maximum density in the R-4 District is <br />12 units per acre. The Master PUD included an additional 14 units on the property, which <br />increased the approved net density for the site to 18.2 units per acre. <br /> <br />Site Data <br />Land Use Plan: Public and Institutional <br />Existing Land Use: Public and Institutional <br />Zoning: R-4: Multiple Dwelling District <br />Current Lot Sizes: 22.5 acres <br />Topography: Varying topography, but generally sloping <br />down to the north and east <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler reviewed the surrounding area, the Plan Evaluation and the Traffic <br />Review. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler provided the Findings of Fact for review: <br /> <br />General Findings: <br />1. The property is located in the R-4 Multiple Dwelling District. <br />2. The City Council approved the Master Planned Unit Development and Final Planned Unit <br />Development Plans for the property in Planning Case 10-012 (Resolution No. 2010-067) <br />on November 29, 2010. <br />3. The PUD Development Agreement requires that any significant changes to the approved <br />plans be reviewed by the Planning Commission and approved by the City Council. <br />4. The PUD process allows for flexibility within the City’s zoning regulations through a <br />negotiated process with a developer. <br />5. The applicant is requesting an amendment to the approved Master and Final PUD for <br />revised development plans for Phase II of the redevelopment project. <br />6. The revised development plans for Phase II of the project are in substantial conformance <br />with the Master and Final PUD plans approved in Planning Case 10-012. <br />7. The applicant is requesting an Amendment to revise the Construction Schedule outlined <br />in the PUD Development Agreement to reflect the delay in the expected start date on the <br />Brownstone Buildings.