Laserfiche WebLink
occupants of the surrounding land, in particular, and the community as a whole, in general, <br />including but not limited to the following factors: <br /> <br />1. Existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions; <br />2. Noise, glare, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid or solid waste, and <br />other nuisance characteristics; <br />3. Drainage; <br />4. Population density; <br />5. Visual and land use compatibility with uses and structures on surrounding land; <br />6. Adjoining land values; <br />7. Park dedications where applicable; and the <br />8. Orderly development of the neighborhood and the City within the general purpose and <br />intent of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City. <br /> <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Staff has two primary concerns about Holiday’s proposal for accent lighting at their service <br />station. First, the lighting is intentionally designed to have a blue hue in order to further brand <br />the site as a Holiday service station. Holiday has installed similar light fixtures on many of the <br />canopies, buildings, and monument signs at their other locations in the metro region. The effect <br />of the accent lighting would be to turn the length of the canopy and building roofline into <br />architectural advertising for the business. The Planning Commission may wish to consider the <br />precedent that could be set if the City approves this type of lighting fixture, which also has a <br />commercial branding purpose. <br /> <br />The second issue identified in the staff evaluation is the glare that would result from the accent <br />lighting. Staff has discussed with the applicant the need to minimize the visual impact of the <br />lighting through improved design. A different manufacturer would be used for the proposed <br />accent lights than the LED lighting which is now installed on the monument sign on the <br />property. However, staff believes that the lighting would still create glare that could have a <br />negative impact for those travelling along Highway 96 and Round Lake Road, as well as for <br />residents in the Arden Manor manufactured home park and residents on the east side of Round <br />Lake. In the Recommendation section below, staff has included two conditions for the Planning <br />Commission’s consideration if a motion to approve is made that would require the accent <br />lighting and the existing LED lights on the monument sign to be dimmed during nighttime hours <br />to reduce their visual impact. <br /> <br />The Planned Unit Development process provides additional flexibility that an underlying zoning <br />district would not otherwise allow. It is intended to overcome the limitations of zoning <br />regulations and to achieve a higher quality project than would otherwise be possible. In <br />considering whether to grant a PUD Amendment in this case, the Planning Commission should <br />consider if the proposal forwards the goals of the City’s Comprehensive Plan and is in the best <br />interest of the community. <br /> <br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meeting for May 6, 2015 <br />P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-008 - Holiday Station - PUD Amendment\Memos_15-008 <br /> <br />Page 5 of 8