Laserfiche WebLink
Plan Review in Fall 2015 or Spring 2016 to complete the necessary site modifications to <br />demarcate the properties. <br /> <br />The Campus Master Plan also indicates a future second access drive for Lot 1 on Hamline <br />Avenue, just north of the existing entrance to this site. The new access is not being evaluated as <br />part of this proposal. Boston Scientific has included this access drive as a possible option for a <br />future property owner or tenant on the site depending on their needs. Construction of this access <br />would require a Site Plan Review as well as approval through the Ramsey County Public Works <br />Department. <br /> <br />The future development plan for the Boston Scientific Campus would be phased over the next 20 <br />years. The construction of new buildings and parking ramps will be coordinated with the future <br />growth of Boston Scientific Corporation. The applicant has provided an estimated construction <br />schedule (Attachment A). As is the case with the existing PUD, any new building construction or <br />site modifications identified on the approved Campus Master Plan will require the submittal of a <br />Site Plan Review for City Council approval prior to construction. Proposed construction or site <br />modifications not conforming to the approved Campus Master Plan would require an amendment <br />to the PUD. This requirement would apply to both Lot 1 and Lot 2. <br /> <br /> <br />2. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Process: <br /> <br />The Planned Unit Development process is a tool that provides additional flexibility for <br />development that an underlying zoning district would not otherwise allow. For example, a PUD <br />may make exceptions to setbacks, lot coverage, parking requirements, signage, building <br />materials, or landscaping requirements. It is intended to overcome the limitations of zoning <br />regulations and improve the overall design of a project. While the PUD process allows the City <br />to negotiate certain aspects of the development, any conditions imposed on the PUD must have a <br />rational basis related to the expected impact of the development. A PUD cannot be used to <br />permit uses that would not otherwise be permitted in the underlying zoning district. <br /> <br />In the original Master PUD approval, the City granted the Guidant Corporation flexibility in <br />terms of their front yard setback, building height, structure coverage, and the number of principal <br />buildings allowed on a single lot. The minimum front yard setback for the I-1 District is 55 feet <br />and in the approved PUD a 50-foot setback was permitted but was applied to the setbacks along <br />all property lines, including rear and side lot lines. The 2002 Campus Master Plan included <br />several proposed buildings with a height in excess of the 35-foot height maximum with the <br />tallest, Building K, proposed at 135 feet. The maximum structure coverage allowed in the I-1 <br />District is 30 percent and at full build out the Master Plan envisioned 32.7 percent structure <br />coverage. Finally, the Zoning Code only permits one principal building per lot. Under the PUD, <br />Guidant was permitted to develop multiple principal buildings on a single parcel. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meeting for February 4, 2015 <br />P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-001 - Boston Scientific - Master PUD Amendment and <br />Subdivision\Memos_15-001 <br />Page 3 of 13 <br />