My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-09-14 PC Minutes
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
PC Minutes 2014
>
07-09-14 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2015 4:09:25 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 4:08:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – July 9, 2014 9 <br /> <br />realignment and change in the roof orientation is reasonable in order for the applicant to <br />construct a functional garage that is accessed from the existing driveway. Due to the scope of the <br />project and the proposed changes to the structure, the character of the neighborhood or the City is <br />not expected to be negatively affected as a structure already exists in the general location of the <br />proposed structure. It does not appear that the variance request is based on economic <br />considerations alone. A detached accessory structure is a permitted use in the R-2 Zoning District <br />and is a reasonable request for the subject property. <br /> <br />City Planner Streff explained that the findings of fact for this variance request support a <br />recommendation for approval. However, if the Planning Commission chooses to make a <br />recommendation for denial, the Findings of Fact would need to be amended to reflect the reasons <br />for the denial. If the Planning Commission recommends approval of this variance, Staff <br />recommends the following ten (10) conditions: <br /> <br />1. That the project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended <br />by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by <br />the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City <br />Council. <br />2. That the proposed accessory structure shall be permitted with a setback of two (2) foot <br />two (2) inches from the west property line and seven (7) feet three (3) inches from the <br />south property line. <br />3. That the proposed accessory structure shall not exceed the footprint of the existing <br />accessory structure that is twenty-two (22) feet by twenty-two (22) feet. <br />4. That the proposed accessory structure shall be permitted to be rotated so that the <br />alignment matches that of the western property line and the angle of the existing single <br />family dwelling. <br />5. That the proposed accessory structure shall be permitted to change the direction of the <br />roofline from an east/west orientation to a north/south orientation with one (1) foot eaves <br />on the north/south facades and (1) foot six (6) inch eaves east/west facades in order to <br />match the existing home <br />6. That the exterior façade and roofing materials of the proposed garage shall match the <br />colors and materials used on the single family dwelling. <br />7. That the existing driveway apron leading to the accessory building shall be removed and <br />that any damage to the right-of-way shall be repaired by the property owner. <br />8. That no living quarters shall be constructed within the proposed accessory structure and <br />that the attic area shall be used for storage purposes only. <br />9. That the structure shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. That building <br />and demolition permits for the construction of the new accessory building and a zoning <br />permit for the construction of the driveway shall be required. <br />10. That the applicant shall obtain a Grading and Erosion Control Permit from the City before <br />the building permit is issued. <br /> <br />City Planner Streff reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this matter: <br /> <br />1. Recommend Approval with Conditions <br />2. Recommend Approval as Submitted. <br />3. Recommend Denial <br />4. Table
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.