My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-15-15-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
06-15-15-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2015 1:01:20 PM
Creation date
7/14/2015 1:00:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—JUNE 15, 2015 3 <br /> (loading dock area) of Building 2 in order to preserve the view of adjacent buildings and to reduce <br /> monotony. A motion was approved to add condition#18 that states: "The Developer shall provide <br /> additional fagade treatments on the south fagade (loading dock area) of Building 2 similar to the <br /> north fagade but not requiring use of the anodized aluminum materials". <br /> City Planner Streff indicated that staff has been working with Roberts Management Group to <br /> ensure that the building design meets the intent of condition#18. In order to satisfy this condition, <br /> Roberts Management Group has provided a fagade design that includes a horizontal sand colored <br /> band along the top edge of the building wall. Staff has reviewed this design and does not believe <br /> that the intent of the condition as approved by the City Council has been met by the proposal. He <br /> explained that Nick Roberts, Roberts Management Group, requested to speak with the Council to <br /> discuss the proposed building design and fagade treatments to be used on Building 2. <br /> Councilmember Holmes requested clarification between the two proposed designs. <br /> City Planner Streff discussed the fagade design plans in further detail with the Council. <br /> Nick Roberts, Roberts Management Group, thanked the Council for their time. He provided <br /> further clarification on the proposed fagade treatments and colors for Building 2. He reviewed a <br /> materials board and reiterated that it was his goal to have a beautiful, high quality building. He <br /> described how the acid washing and sand blasting would impact the finish. <br /> Mayor Grant commented that the orientation of Building 2 was a concern, in addition to the east <br /> elevation of this building. <br /> The Council discussed the close proximity of Building 2 to the adjacent property. <br /> Councilmember Holden did not like the band at the top of the building. <br /> Mr. Roberts agreed stating that he believed the building was nice-looking without the additional <br /> banding. <br /> Councilmember Holmes asked if the developer could pursue a third panel color. <br /> Mr. Roberts indicated that this would increase his costs exponentially and would put further <br /> delays on his project. He explained how he would rather acid wash or sandblast the panels to <br /> create a third color along the elevation. He provided further comment on the discussions he has <br /> had with his architect. <br /> Community Development Director Hutmacher stated that from a staff perspective, she believed <br /> that the one band could not be considered as "the additional fagade treatments". <br /> Mayor Grant agreed. <br /> City Administrator Klaers inquired if the project would be delayed until next year if the Council <br /> did not believe the proposed band met with the intent of the additional fagade treatments. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.