Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – July 8, 2015 3 <br /> <br />2. A building permit shall be obtained for all proposed antennas and associate equipment <br />prior to installation. <br />3. A Conditional Use Permit drafted by the City Attorney shall be signed by the applicant <br />and the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits. <br />4. The antennas and equipment shall be painted to match the color of the structure to which <br />they are attached. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this <br />matter: <br /> <br />1. Recommend Approval with Conditions <br />2. Recommend Approval as Submitted. <br />3. Recommend Denial <br />4. Table <br /> <br />Vice Chair Hames opened the floor to Commissioner comments. <br /> <br />The Commission had no comments or questions. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Hames opened the public hearing at 6:42 p.m. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Hames invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and make <br />comment. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woodburn reviewed several slides with the Planning Commission. He <br />understood that Bethel University was requesting an accessory use. He discussed the differences <br />between a principal and accessory use. He questioned if the accessory use of the 2 Pine Tree <br />Drive site was the college itself. He recommended that the zoning definitions be reviewed by the <br />Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jones believed that Bethel University was the principal use at 2 Pine Tree Drive <br />and that the proposed Verizon Wireless antennas would be an accessory use. <br /> <br />There being no additional comment Vice Chair Hames closed the public hearing at 6:48 p.m. <br /> <br />Commissioner Holewa moved and Commissioner Bartel seconded a motion to recommend <br />approval of Planning Case 15-014 for a Conditional Use Permit at 2 Pine Tree Drive based <br />on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the four (4) conditions in <br />the July 8, 2015, report to the Planning Commission. The motion carried unanimously (6- <br />0). <br />