Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – May 6, 2015 7 <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman did not want more light on the Holiday site than what was currently <br />present. He encouraged Holiday to be sensitive to the surrounding properties and to blend in <br />with the adjacent residential and commercial uses. He did not want to see an island of light <br />created from this site. <br /> <br />Commissioner Holewa discussed the amount of light pollution in the metro area. He was in <br />favor of a dimmer being installed on the monument sign whether or not the PUD amendment was <br />approved. <br /> <br />Chair Thompson asked how the Commission should address the LED dimmer condition. She <br />questioned if staff was willing to work with the applicant on the nits measurement. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler stated that he would recommend that the nits standard be followed <br />as this would provide a clear and objective measurement on the amount of light coming from the <br />site. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hames questioned how staff would like the language within Condition 3 to read. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler suggested that Condition 3 be amended to read: An automatic <br />dimmer module shall be installed to reduce the nighttime light output of the LED accent lights on <br />the canopy and building to sixty percent (60%) of the daytime level during night time hours and <br />reduced to a nits reading of no more than 350 if complaints are received. He believed it may be <br />more effective to have the 350 nits requirement in place from the beginning as it would be easier <br />to enforce. <br /> <br />Commissioner Holewa asked if staff was provided with the applicant’s findings of fact. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler commented that the applicant’s findings of fact were provided to <br />staff prior to the meeting. He explained that if the Planning Commission were to approve the <br />Planning Case, it would need to state, for the record, findings of approval. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jones encouraged the residents that did not support the PUD amendment to be <br />present at the City Council meeting on May 26, 2015, when this matter will be reviewed. <br /> <br />Chair Thompson noted that the City Council meeting to be held on May 26th would not consist <br />of another public hearing for this planning case. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hames moved and Commissioner Jones seconded a motion to recommend <br />approval of Planning Case 15-008 a PUD Amendment at 1920 West Highway 96, as <br />amended by the four (4) conditions provided by staff in the May 6, 2015, Report to the <br />Planning Commission, based on the submitted plans and the findings of fact amending <br />Condition #3 and Condition #4 as follows: <br /> <br />3. An automatic dimmer module shall be installed to reduce the nighttime light output <br />of the LED accent lights on the canopy and building to 350 nits. <br />4. An automatic dimmer module shall be installed on the existing monument sign on <br />the property to reduce the nighttime light output of the LED lights on the sign to <br />350 nits.