Laserfiche WebLink
price <br /> 6516360871 05!21/01 04: 19P P-002 <br /> v ..s <br /> Willie J. Price <br /> 3471 Siems Court <br /> Arden Hills, NN 55112 <br /> 651.636.0869 <br /> May 21, 2001 <br /> Arden Hills City Council <br /> City of Arden Hills <br /> 4364 West Round Lake Road <br /> Arden I-Tills, Minnesota 55112-5794 <br /> Arden hills City Council: <br /> This is a comment to the understanding I have of your response to the proposal from the <br /> Operations and Finance Committee regarding the compliance with and enforcement of <br /> Ordinance No. 181. First of all, I would like to thank each of you fbr your willingness to <br /> utilize your time and talents for the betterment of the City of Arden Hills, T have lived in <br /> this arca for more than twenty years and have seen the growth and maturity that has <br /> occurred. Case in point is the number ol'locations for the city hall and the growth of the <br /> staff over those years culminating; in the soon to be completed facility. The constant <br /> challenge is to avoid special interest concerns and act always in the best interest of the <br /> city. To say the least managing change often requires difficult decisions. Albert .Einstein <br /> once said, "The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because <br /> of those who look on and do nothing." <br /> T would respectfully like to offer a suggestion for you consideration. For the record, 1 am <br /> a homeowner with lakeshore property and a frequent user of Take Johanna. As 1 <br /> understand the facts, there is a valid city ordinance that is the responsibility of the city of <br /> Arden Hills to enlbrce, repeal or modify. Because the ordinance has been ignored in the <br /> past does not mean it should be ignored in the future. The provisions of the ordinance arc <br /> clearly enumerated by signage at the public boat landing and at least once a year in the <br /> Arden Hills Notes andJor the Lake Johanna Tmprovement Society newsletter. As I see it, <br /> the problem is how to mark/identify the no wake area. Without a clear understanding of <br /> where this area begins, it is unreasonable to expect compliance. I hope you share my <br /> belief of the unacceptable option of ignoring the violators. Most ofus are aware of the <br /> increased driving risk when the burs are getting out but there is a clear reference fbr <br /> consequences when violators are caught with moving violations and/or driving under the <br /> influence. I would chalIcngc each member of the council to estimate the various distances <br /> while operating a watercraft. Watercraft operation has some ofthe more lenient <br /> requirements for operators, yet the city of Arden Hills is expecting many operators to <br /> monitor their own behavior by estimating distance. <br /> • <br />