Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION—JUNE 18, 2001 DRAF <br /> -� <br /> Councilmembers were in agreement that City Administrator Lynch prepare a <br /> specific agenda for the PMP Worksessions scheduled one hour before each <br /> Council meeting, in order to allow Councilmembers to have a goal for each <br /> meeting. <br /> COMPREHENSIVE PARK PLAN <br /> Discussion was held regarding public notice of the upcoming neighborhood <br /> meetings to receive input on the park plan. <br /> Staff was directed to mail individually addressed, first class letters to all City <br /> residents informing them of the meetings, in addition to the notice in the City <br /> newsletter, cable and website. <br /> FIFTIETH ANNIVERSARYIDAY IN THE PARK EVENT <br /> Mr. Moore provided a summary and overview of the final details and logistics for <br /> the Anniversary event. Mr. Moore informed Councilmembers that Ramsey <br /> County would be unable to provide picnic tables at Tony Schmidt Park due to a <br /> vendor problem. <br /> Mayor Probst directed Mr. Moore to contact Greg Mack, informing him that <br /> Mayor Probst would be contacting Ramsey County Commissioner, Tony Bennett, <br /> for assistance in ensuring that the park would include picnic tables, the necessary <br /> temporary repairs would be made in the one pavilion to make it useable for the <br /> event, and any other needs to make the event successful. <br /> EROSION SEDIMENT CONTROL ORDINANCE REVIEW <br /> The Council requested further clarification regarding the format presented by staff <br /> for their review of the proposed erosion sediment control ordinance. Discussion <br /> items included page seven (variance section); page nine (which entity has final <br /> jurisdiction); referencing the annual fee review, rather than using specific <br /> numbers for fines and fees within the ordinance; and references to the "handbook" <br /> without a copy being available for reference. <br /> Staff was directed to provide a final draft of the ordinance, rather than a generic <br /> version, by the June 25th Council meeting for review and further discussion, <br /> anticipating formal action at the July 9th meeting. <br /> RIGHT-OF-WAY ORDINANCE REVIEW <br /> The Council once again requested further clarification regarding the format <br /> presented by staff for their review of the proposed right-of-way ordinance. <br /> Discussion items included whether all changes had been incorporated (i.e., City <br /> Attorney, former Planner); confirmation of the 12 month or 36 month restoration <br />