My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 06-25-2001
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCP 06-25-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2015 7:46:45 AM
Creation date
8/13/2015 4:56:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
#2 states that antennas are only allowed only, "...on property containing a principal <br /> use to which the antenna, dish antenna or tower is accessory". Therefore, the <br /> proposed antenna is not a permitted principal use in the G-B District. <br /> 2. Development Standards <br /> a) Structure Height <br /> The District Requirements Chart of the Zoning Ordinance states a maximum <br /> structure height of 35 feet for the District. However, Section 5 (M) #5 (b) <br /> contradicts this by stating that, "multi-story buildings will be encouraged", "the <br /> use of stepped buildings in encouraged" and"the location of buildings relative to <br /> their heights will consider views"within the Gateway Business District. The <br /> intent of the District is to promote high quality, large scale development and take <br /> full advantage of the site's location. The proposed height of the two office <br /> buildings is 56 feet each, exceeding the 35 foot maximum for the District. The <br /> proposed antenna is 750 feet in height where only a maximum of 75 feet is <br /> permitted, if it is accessory to the primary use on the property. <br /> b) Structure Setbacks <br /> Building setback requirements for the District are as follows: 50 feet from streets <br /> and exterior property lines; 20 feet from side and rear property lines. The front <br /> yard is defined as the part of the lot that abuts a street. The proposed bisects the <br /> site although the property lines do not. The proposed office buildings meet the <br /> setback requirements from both the proposed street and I-694, as shown on the <br /> plans. The proposed accessory structure below the antenna does not meet the <br /> Ordinance requirements since it has been placed in the front yard of the lot. Front <br /> yards in this proposal are considered that property which abuts the proposed street <br /> (on both the North and South side) and the property abutting I-694. Any accessory <br /> structures on this property would have to be located in the side yard of the office <br /> buildings. <br /> c) Structure Exteriors <br /> The Zoning Ordinance requires that exterior wall surfaces in the GB District be <br /> brick, stone, glass or any combination of these. The exterior materials proposed <br /> for the office buildings and accessory structure are prefinished aluminum,brick <br /> and glass. Prefinished aluminum is not a material permitted by the Zoning <br /> Ordinance. The applicant has supplied plans and elevations of the proposed office <br /> buildings. Although the accessory structure has been described in the narrative, <br /> there are no plans showing it in elevation which should have been submitted. <br /> d) Traffic <br /> A traffic study for the District was completed by BRW in 1998, analyzing <br /> potential development and still keeping Highway 96 and Round Lake Road within <br /> design capacity. SEH completed another traffic study in 2000, analyzing BRW's <br /> study and taking into consideration the potential development by Chesapeake <br /> Companies in the northeast quadrant of I-35W and I-694. The applicant obtained <br /> another traffic analysis from Biko and Associates, analyzing the traffic impact of <br /> the proposed development of the tower site. <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.