My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 06-25-2001
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CCP 06-25-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2015 7:46:45 AM
Creation date
8/13/2015 4:56:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
acces ory use rinci al use <br /> Building Setbacks closest <br /> Streets 50 120 N/A N/A <br /> Exterior Property Lines 50 50 N/A N/A <br /> Interior Property Lines 20 140 N/A N/A <br /> Exterior Materials Brick,stone, Prefmished N/A N/A <br /> glass;metal aluminum, <br /> trim/accessories brick and <br /> lass <br /> Parking Setbacks <br /> Public Streets 50 21 N/A N/A <br /> Side or Rear 20 20 N/A N/A <br /> Parkin <br /> Offices 1/250 sq.ft. 1,062 N/A N/A <br /> spaces <br /> Street Width(ROW) 60 24 N/A N/A <br /> Site Access Must have access to Not Must have Not accessible <br /> public street accessible access to to existing <br /> to existing public street Gateway Blvd. <br /> Gateway <br /> Blvd. <br /> Deadline for Agency Actions <br /> The City of Arden Hills received the complete application for this request on May 9, 2001. <br /> Pursuant to Minnesota State Statue the City must act on this request by July 8, 2001 (60 <br /> days),unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day <br /> review period. The additional review period would extend to August 7, 2001. The City <br /> may,with the petitioner's consent, extend the review period beyond the August 7, 2001 <br /> date. <br /> Lastly, if the City denies the petitioner's request, "... it must state in writing the reason for <br /> the denial at the time that it denies the request." <br /> Options <br /> 1. Recommend approval as submitted. <br /> 2. Recommend approval with conditions. <br /> 3. Recommend denial with reasons for denial. <br /> 4. Table for additional information. <br /> Recommendation <br /> Staff can offer the following preliminary comments on the concept PUD in Planning Case <br /> #01-10: <br /> 1. It should be clarified if the proposed antenna tower is 700 feet (per the plans) or 750 <br /> feet in height(per the narrative); <br /> 2. The antenna tower could not be reconstructed for the following reasons: <br /> ■ The tower is currently a nonconforming structure that can not be rebuilt without <br /> conforming with the Zoning Ordinance; <br /> ■ The tower is not permitted as a principal use on the property; <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.