CCP 06-25-2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

■ The tower exceeds the maximum allowable height of 75 feet; ■ The tower is nearer to the property line than the height of the tower. 3. No more than 50% of a project's total floor area may be office; 4. The height of the proposed office buildings shall not exceed 35 feet; 5. The conflicting Zoning Ordinance text regarding the maximum height requirement and percentage of office within the District should be discussed and clarified by the City; 6. The accessory structure for the antenna must be located in the side or rear yard, not the front, and additional elevation information is needed to properly evaluate the structure; 7. Exterior materials for the office buildings and accessory structure include prefinished aluminum which is not identified as a permitted material; 8. A pedestrian trail easement by Round Lake would be requested as part of this development; 9. Surface and ramped parking requires a setback of 50 feet from the proposed and existing street which is not met; 10. The proposed street should be public with a required right-of-way width of no less than 60 feet for a local street, since it is located on an existing 66 foot public utility easement; 11. The development of the property requires direct access to Gateway Boulevard which it currently does not have; 12. Consideration should be made for improvements to the Hwy 96/10 and 96/I-35W intersections as per the traffic study; 13. Reconstruction of the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Round Lake Road should be considered to accommodate development; and 14. The applicant must obtain all necessary reviews and permits from Rice Creek Watershed District. Notes If the Planning Commission makes a recommendation on this Planning Case, then it would be heard at the Monday, June 25, 2001 regular meeting of the City Council. Update Pleased be advised that the Planning Commission, at their June 6, 2001, regular meeting, indicated they are not in favor of the proposal in Planning Case#01-10. 7