Laserfiche WebLink
11) The single most investment restricting issue about Arden Hills is: <br /> Don't know. Tell us about the restrictions. <br /> _. The arsenals property should be at the top of the list, as I'm sure it is! <br /> 3, Activist, modern-day Luddites, who oppose everything -- best characterized by the acronym, BANANA: <br /> Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near An thin . <br /> 4, No land? High property taxes? <br /> 5. Needin multiple levels of permission for any development. <br /> ¢. Lack of funds. <br /> Z. available land? <br /> $, don't know of one issue <br /> �. Marginal conditions on available vacant land is one. Not sure if it's the single most. Strong NIMBY <br /> groundswells seem to be powerful forces for thwarting some basicall sound ro osals. <br /> The " not in my backyard" special interests. <br /> I, That is best left to a business person to answer. I will call my friend who manages a business here and <br /> re uest that he fill out the surve . <br /> Difficult for me to speculate but past practices and city culture may be an issue. <br /> lack of a time line on the Arsenal..no clear picture <br /> IA. Lack of expansion areas <br /> Investment should be restricted in Arden Hills. The city should listen to the residents because residents <br /> do not want increased development in the city, primarily because residents like the open space and do <br /> not want every inch of the city developed. Residents do not want TCAPP developed; TCAPP should be a <br /> ark. Also traffic in Arden Hills and the surroundingcommunities is gettingto be a problem. <br /> �¢. S ace? <br /> tcca <br /> I'm not sure; available land? <br /> LIMITED SPACE FOR NEW DEVELOPMENTS <br /> 2& Don't know. But I would suspect that it is the micro-managing done by the city council to almost every <br /> issue that is before it. Business needs to make decisions and move forward. It does not need to debate <br /> forever on every piece of a project or proposal. Sure, mistakes will be made.They should be made by <br /> staff,2thecouncil which has neither the time,the abilit or the trainin to nit ick ever decision. <br /> � roadw2j. With nof the otential for TCAAP a lack of develo able land. <br /> Roadture. e.g. Hamline Ave Mess as it became the thoroufare to Highway 36 and other <br /> Rosevons. <br /> Zg. the reat unresolved distaraction: TCAAP !! <br /> 25. Lack of vacant land. <br /> 2f,. lack of city response <br /> ?,Z, Lack of land for development.TCAAP may help solve this, but a better working relationship between <br /> residents, business and cit ov't. needs to occur. <br /> Z& size of cit <br /> 22. Failure to bring the TCCAP project to closure. It is obvious that some councilmembers do not favor <br /> development <br /> Arden Hills Economic Development Survey <br /> June — July 2006 Based Upon 76 Responses <br />