My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-12-15-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
10-12-15-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2015 2:28:16 PM
Creation date
10/9/2015 2:27:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – SEPTEMBER 28, 2015 5 <br /> <br />B. Assignment of Development Agreement – Arden Plaza LLC and Frattallone <br />LLC <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes requested further information regarding this item from staff. She <br />believed that this item was important enough and should not have been on the Consent Agenda. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Bachler discussed the proposed assignment development agreement between <br />Arden Plaza, LLC and Frattallone, LLC. He noted that Arden Plaza, LLC has requested approval <br />of two separate agreements in order to clarify certain terms and obligations between the parties. <br />He reported that if these terms or responsibilities were not being met by Frattallone, LLC the City <br />could then follow up with this property owner and would not have to be in contact with Arden <br />Plaza, LLC. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes expressed concern with being a part of this agreement. She believed <br />that the agreement should only be between the two parties involved. She then provided further <br />comment on the Release of Seller. <br /> <br />City Attorney Jamnik discussed how the agreement came to the City. He advised that Arden <br />Plaza, LLC was interested in selling two lots. He reported there was little in this transaction for <br />the City but to provide a zoning letter. He commented that the City’s involvement was only to <br />provide this assistance and would therefore release the Seller from obligations and allow these to <br />be transferred to the Purchaser. He was satisfied with the obligations spelled out within the <br />agreement and did not believe the City would assume any undue risk. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes expressed concern with why the Seller was requesting the City be <br />involved. She feared that not all scenarios were planned for and questioned how the City would <br />react to that situation in the future. She was in favor of the City not being involved in these <br />agreements. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the terms and conditions within the agreements. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked what leverage the City had with the Purchaser. <br /> <br />City Attorney Jamnik reported that the City had letters of credit with both Purchasers, as well as <br />the right to assess both properties for any necessary improvements. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung suggested that staff review these agreements further in case there <br />were additional items that needed consideration or rewording. <br /> <br />City Attorney Jamnik noted that the parking spaces and striping were the only areas of most <br />concern to staff at this time. He did not feel it was necessary to delay the agreements and closing <br />for these issues. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden questioned why the Council should support this agreement if <br />Frattallone, LLC has already closed on the sale of the property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.