Laserfiche WebLink
11 <br />Several Public Hearings in the past weeks were: <br />11 <br />11 <br />II <br />11 <br />u <br />..... Before the Planning Commission on January 4, Skyline Builders, --re <br />development of the property along County Road F east of the bus barns <br />requested a re -zoning of part of the property from R-1 to R-`2 to permit <br />smaller lots for some of the proposed 17 -lot subdivision. The P.C. recom- <br />mended that Council approve this partial re -zoning, but Council's decision <br />was No, so it's back to the drawing board for Skyline..... At the February <br />1 Planning Commission meeting the development of Edgewater South Subdivision <br />and Karth Lake Estates Subdivision were discussed. No recommendations by <br />the P.C. were made; both developments still under study by.the Commission... <br />COMING UP: A PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION, FEBRUARY 15, <br />8:00 P.M., VILLAGE HALL RE "HONDA HILLS" PUD PROPOSAL. Ban -Con <br />will present plans for approximately 150 single family dwell- <br />ings proposed for this County Road E-2 site. <br />(Have you ever wondered why you read in the Crier about some events before- <br />hand and others after -the -fact? Unfortunately, advance notice is not always <br />possible as we "go to press" only once a month. However, in cases of re- <br />zoning or requests for Special Use Permits, legal notice is always given in <br />the New Brighton Bulletin, the Village's official notice -giving paper, and <br />property owners within 350' of such proposals are always notified by mail.) <br />.... At the January 24 Council meeting the decision was made to notify <br />Ramsey County to go ahead with its plans and specs for widening Lexington <br />Avenue Between County Roads D and E to the proposed 52t width..... <br />UPDATE..... Council voted the same evening to delete that "P-1" zoning <br />description discussed on the previous page. Areas so designated will re- <br />vert to their previous R-1 or R-2 categories..... <br />'****It is unlikely additional Public Hearings will be scheduled by Council <br />on the Zoning Ordinance and Mai; - which is not to say, however, that there <br />will be no further discussion on this issue before a vote is taken in Coun- <br />cil. It would be assumed that at the next meeting (February 14) Council <br />will indeed have to continue to face community members with new statements <br />to make. Although the Zoning Ordinance and map has been viewed, reviewed, <br />hashed and re -hashed for over three years by Village officials and the Vil- <br />lage Planner, affording those involved with its development a pretty thor- <br />ough understanding of its implications, such is not the case with the aver- <br />age resident. And some of these residents have a few more words they wish <br />to say on the subject. Undoubtedly the Ordinance must come to a final vote <br />before whatever laws affecting its adoption and implementation become obso- <br />lete themselves (or before the Councilmen do'). Meanwhile several thoughts <br />must be kept in mind: Elected officials would be remiss in failing to lis- <br />ten to new and relevant input from their constituents. However, trust, <br />relevancy and practicality must.be maintained as this input is given..... <br />the Zoning Ordinance can't remain in limbo forever.... let's hope that soon, <br />after thousands of hours of research, head -scratching and debate, it can <br />be codified, legalizing the guidelines under which Arden Hills proceeds with <br />its orderly growth..... <br />