My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-30-15-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
11-30-15-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2015 8:03:28 AM
Creation date
11/30/2015 12:27:20 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
203
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meeting for November 4, 2015 <br />P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2015\PC 15-022 - Zoning Code Amendment - Accessory Antennas\Memos_15-022 <br /> <br />Page 1 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: November 4, 2015 PC Agenda Item 3.B <br /> <br />TO: Planning Commission <br /> <br />FROM: Matthew Bachler, Associate Planner <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Planning Case #15-022 – Public Hearing Required <br /> Applicant: City of Arden Hills <br /> Request: Zoning Code Amendment – Accessory Antennas, Dish Antennas, and <br />Towers <br /> <br /> <br />Requested Action <br /> <br />Consider approval of Planning Case 15-022 to amend Section 1325.09 of the Zoning Code <br />pertaining to the regulation of accessory antennas, dish antennas, and towers, as presented in the <br />November 4, 2015, report to the Planning Commission. <br /> <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />The City approved a Conditional Use Permit in July 2015 for the installation of wireless panel <br />antennas and related equipment at the existing Bethel University building at 2 Pine Tree Drive. <br />During the City Council review of this request, a question arose regarding whether the antennas <br />should be considered an accessory use because they did not directly support or complement the <br />principal use of the property for higher education and office activities. The City Attorney <br />subsequently provided a memo that responded to this question and suggested revisions to the <br />Zoning Code to help clarify the issue (Attachment B). <br /> <br />The City Council discussed the recommendations made by the City Attorney at their regular <br />meeting on August 31, 2015. It was the consensus of the City Council that an amendment to the <br />Zoning Code should be processed to incorporate the proposed revisions. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.