My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-25-16-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
01-25-16-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2016 12:32:36 PM
Creation date
2/9/2016 12:31:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—JANUARY 25, 2016 5 <br /> Senior Planner Bachler reported this was the case, noting that there was no evidence of an <br /> escrow being collected. <br /> Mayor Grant asked if an escrow was now going to be collected. <br /> Senior Planner Bachler indicated that the City was not asking the new property owner to provide <br /> an escrow for these improvements. The reason for keeping the condition regarding the extension <br /> of Shoreline Lane in place was to ensure that the new property owner understands the City's intent <br /> to extend Shoreline Lane if 3187 Lexington Avenue were to be subdivided. <br /> Mayor Grant questioned if the City typically acted as the escrow agent. <br /> Senior Planner Bachler reported that this was the case. <br /> Mayor Grant encouraged staff to create a checklist within the Finance Department to ensure <br /> escrows were properly tracked on behalf of the City. <br /> Further discussion ensued regarding future assessments and escrows on this property. <br /> Councilmember Holmes did not believe that the documentation before the Council this evening <br /> did not address any future assessments. She did not recall any talk of the City ever pushing <br /> Shoreline Lane through either. <br /> Mayor Grant did recall discussions of past City Councils regarding the extension of Shoreline <br /> Lane. He noted that the property owners at 3177 Shoreline Lane and 3187 Lexington Avenue <br /> would be responsible for paying City assessments if Shoreline Lane were pushed through. <br /> Senior Planner Bachler stated that he could not speculate on how the future development of this <br /> roadway would occur. In addition, he could not determine how future Council's would handle <br /> future assessments. <br /> Councilmember McClung asked if this entire process hinged on the property at 3187 Lexington <br /> Avenue subdividing. <br /> Community Development Director Hutmacher reported that this was the case. She stated that <br /> at this time, two neighborhoods had only one access point. For this reason, the City was <br /> proposing to push a secondary access point through at Shoreline Lane if the property at 3187 <br /> Lexington Avenue were to subdivide. She did not have an opinion on how the project would be <br /> assessed and noted that the City was not waiving its right to assess. She suggested if the Council <br /> had further questions that this item be tabled to a future meeting where the City Attorney could be <br /> in attendance. <br /> Mayor Grant asked if the City Attorney had reviewed the proposed documents. <br /> Community Development Director Hutmacher indicated that this was the case. <br /> Councilmember McClung did not believe the matter had to be tabled. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.