My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4D, 2011 PMP Feasibility Report
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
11-15-10-S
>
4D, 2011 PMP Feasibility Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2024 10:23:28 AM
Creation date
2/19/2016 4:13:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Matt Woodruff <br />From: K�istine Giga <br />Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 20'f 0 9:05 AM <br />To: Matt Woodruff <br />Subject: FW: Amble Road �econstruction plan <br />Attachments: insufficient road overlay.JPG; needs total reconstfuctian.JPG; typica! road edge.JPG; utility <br />work area needing attention.JPG <br />From: sjharpstead@comcastnet [mailto:sjharpstead@comcast.net] <br />Sent: Moncfay, September 27, 2010 10:18 PM <br />To: Kristine Giga; Terry Maurer <br />Cc: Patrictc Klaers <br />Subject: Fwd: Amble Road reconstruction plan <br />f3'fi <br />Stan H_ <br />---- Fo►warded Message ---- <br />F�om: "Keith Myrme[" <br />To: sjharpsiead@comcast.net, "david grant" <david_grant@ci.arden-hiits.mn.us>, <br />holdenbj24@aoI_com, franh1'16@aol_com, davemcclung@comcast.net <br />Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 6:36:50 PM <br />Subject: RE: Arnble Road reconstruction plan <br />Greetings, <br />Thank you for reposnding to me. <br />Here are some additional thoughts regarding Amble Road, from my perspective as a professional <br />�andscape Architect for the past 30 years, recenily retired, and presently manager for multimillion <br />dollar projects for downtown condominiums, including road and parking projects: <br />- The last overlay was clearly poor(y done. !n the pictures, you can see tha# there was no <br />minimum of 2" of new asphait, but merely %" in same areas. <br />-!t is common to rebuild sectians with poor subsoil and tnen resurface the sntire road. <br />- There are definite areas of road reconstruction needed due to paor subsoi!_ ! noted three or <br />four areas totaling abou# 6000 square fest, a small portion of the overall total. <br />- Existing drainage ponds (some naiural .and some created, modern name "Rain ponds") are <br />handling the runaff and filtering needed. Reconstruction will create additional issues far Karth <br />Lake, and new drainage ponds, if not done properly, couid alsa create additional issues. What <br />is fhe estimated displacement of runoff as opposed to the existing situation and reasoning? I'm <br />pretty sure we have had at least one 100 year storm this summe� and have not had any issues <br />with the handling of the runoff. We would expect any contract to define ful( responsibi(i#y for <br />any issues or faiiures in new systei�is. <br />- The east end of the road is in much better condition than from Hamline to Dellwo�d Streef, <br />clearly indicating the excessive additional road traffic from the neighborhood to the nor#h of us. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.