Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COiJNCIL — October 25, 2010 4 1 <br />7. A. ZDlI Pavemerrt Management Program — Feasibility Study (continued) � <br />three options with the report for assessing the multi-famiiy/townhome properties that will receive <br />benef t from the propased improvements. These options are: 1. Percentage based on a vehicle trip <br />calculation which would be equal to 60% of the assessment rate for a single-family unit; 2. Assess <br />the multi-family unit for only their portion of the improvements or the improvements on their <br />streets; 3. Assess ali units equai and assess all properties at the same rate. After the City Council <br />decides which of the three options should be used for an assessment methodology, Staif will <br />finalize the report and then formally submit the report to the Council at the November 8, 2010 <br />meeting along with a resolution receiving the Feasibility Report and setting the Pubiic Hearing for <br />December 13, 2410. <br />Mayor Harpstead stated this project is in his neighborhood so he will abstain from voting on any <br />matters relating to this project. <br />Counci(member Holmes stated the City had a public hearing for Presbyterian Homes on <br />December 13. She suggested having the public hearing for this project at a different meeting. <br />Civil Engineer Giga stated she would check into November 29 to be sure the City could meet the <br />legal notification requirements and schedule the public hearing for this meeting if possible. <br />Councilmember Holden stated she would like ta have this public hearing before January in order <br />to ensure the City is able to go out for bids early. In the past this has proven advantageous for the . <br />City and residents. She stated she would be open to having a special meeting if necessary. <br />Councilmember Grant stated he woutd also be open to a special meeting if necessary. <br />Councilmember Holden asked what the life expectancy would be for this road since this project <br />wiIl be a bituminous reclamation rather than a reconstruction. <br />Civii Engineer Giga stated the City had done a bituminous reclamation project in the Briarknoll <br />neighborhood in 2Q07. The Iife expectancy for this type of road is 20 to 25 years versus 12 to 15 <br />years for a mill and overlay. She stated she would Iook into this project and provide the <br />assessment figures to the CounciI. The cost for recIamation is more than doing a mitl and overlay <br />but is less than it would be to do a full reconstruction. She explained that the reclamation process <br />was a futl depth replacement of the pavement. It is replacing the street without digging up all the <br />ald material, Ieaving existing curb and gutter in place. <br />Councilmember Holden asked if the removal of the landscaped island in the cul-de-sac on Arden <br />View Court was built into the cost estimate at this time. <br />Civil Engineer Giga stated that complete removal of isIand is not included but modifications to <br />the size of the island are incIuded. <br />Councilmember Holden asked if making the cul-de-sacs on Karth Lake smaller was included in � <br />the cost estimate. <br />