Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COLTNCIL — October 25, 2010 8 � <br />8. A. Resolution 2010-052 Disapproving Municipal Consent for I-694/T�I51 Mn1DOT <br />Improvement (continued) � <br />Public Works Director Maurer stated this item outlined the City's request that any fill generated <br />by the project be used to construct berms within the project area and "additional fll" is <br />referencing any excess fill. The City is requesting this excess fill be used for berming west of the <br />project area. <br />Councilmember Grant stated the Council had talked about having a tra.il on both sides of <br />Snelling Avenue. He asked why this request was not reflected in Item 8, Exhibit A. <br />Public Works Director Maurer stated Staff had been out to the area and there does not appear to <br />be enough width to accommodate this request. There is adequate width to provide for a trail on <br />the west side. The proposed trail widths could be changed to reflect the smaller area but Staff had <br />understood that the width of the bridge was expected to remain the same. <br />Councilmember Holmes stated Item 4, Exhibit A, should also reference the traffic flows and <br />modeling should take the railroad crossing into account. This crossing does cause delays in traffic <br />because of trains coming through the area during high traffic times. <br />MOTION: Mavor Harpstead moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a motion to <br />amend Item 4, Exhibit A, the phrase "including the railroad crossin� on <br />Lexington Avenue" be added at the end of the first sentence. The motion . <br />carried unanimously (5-0). <br />Councilmember Holmes clarified there would be a signal on County road F and Snelling Avenue <br />and there would be no cost to the City for this signal. <br />Public Works Director Maurer stated this was correct. The document references this signal as <br />proposed at this time because it has not been constructed yet. <br />Councilmember Holmes stated the proposed project impacts two major corporations in Arden <br />Hills, Boston Scientific and Land O'Lakes. She asked if a condition could be added that these <br />corporations be included in the negotiations. <br />Public Works Director Maurer stated Staff has sent the proposed draft language to the cities of <br />Shoreview and New Brighton. He stated this could also be sent to Boston Scientific and Land <br />O'Lakes for comment. At this time Staff has not heard from either corporation. <br />CounciImember Grant requested Mounds View also be included in receiving a copy af the <br />resolution. <br />Councilmember Holden stated in the past Mn/DOT has achieved significant cost savings by <br />lessening project improvements through Arden Hills and this "cheapening" has been on the backs <br />of Arden Hills residents. � <br />