My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-28-16-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
03-28-16-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2025 3:00:10 PM
Creation date
3/25/2016 11:39:28 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
260
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City of Arden Hills <br />City Council Meeting for March 28, 2016 <br />P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2016\PC 16-005 - 3382 Lake Johanna Blvd - Variance\Memos_Reports_16-005 <br /> <br />Page 6 of 6 <br /> <br />Notice <br /> <br />Although a variance does not require a public hearing, a public meeting notice was prepared by <br />the City and mailed to properties within 350 feet of the subject property. <br /> <br /> <br />Resident Comments <br /> <br />Staff has received comments from the residents at 3356, 3368, and 3379 Lake Johanna <br />Boulevard and 1825 Lake Lane regarding this project. The property owners at 3379 Lake <br />Johanna Boulevard object to the plans because the project would obscure views of the lake and <br />the University of Northwestern’s campus. All three of the other property owners stated that they <br />were not opposed to the requested variance. Copies of the four emails received by staff are <br />included in Attachment F. <br /> <br /> <br />Deadline for Agency Actions <br /> <br />The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on February 1, 2016. <br />Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by April 1, 2016 (60 days), <br />unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60-day review <br />period. The City may extend the review period beyond the 120 days, with the applicant’s <br />permission. <br /> <br /> <br />Attachments <br /> <br />A. Land Use Application and Variance Request Letter <br />B. Location and Aerial Maps <br />C. Existing and Proposed Site Plan <br />D. Proposed Building Floor Plans and Elevations <br />E. Property Owners’ Description of Project <br />F. Resident Comments <br />G. Planning Commission Report, March 9, 2016 <br />H. Draft Planning Commission Minutes, March 9, 2016 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.