Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meeting for April 6, 2016 <br /> <br />P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2016\PC 16-008 - 1865 County Road D - Variance\Memos_Reports_16-008 <br /> <br />Page 4 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />D. Structure Height – Meets Requirements <br /> <br />The proposed accessory structure would not exceed the 15-foot height maximum for <br />accessory structures. <br /> <br /> <br />2. Flood Plain, Wetlands, and Easements <br /> <br />The proposed addition is outside of any flood plains, wetlands, or easements. <br /> <br /> <br />3. Additional Review <br /> <br />The Building Official and City Engineer reviewed the plans for the project and had no <br />additional comments at this time. <br /> <br /> <br />Variance Evaluation Criteria <br /> <br />On May 5, 2011, the Governor signed into law new variance legislation that changed the review <br />criteria Cities must use when evaluating variance requests. The new law renames the municipal <br />variance standard from “undue hardship” to “practical difficulties,” but otherwise retains the <br />familiar three-factor test of (1) reasonableness, (2) uniqueness, and (3) essential character. Also <br />included is a sentence new to city variance authority that was already in the county statutes: <br />“Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and <br /> <br />Existing Proposed <br />Square Feet % Square Feet % <br />House 777 6.39% 777 6.39% <br />Detached Garage 404 3.32% 728 5.99% <br />Decks/Patios 473 3.89% 473 3.89% <br />Shed 126 1.04% 126 1.04% <br />Structure Coverage 1,780 14.64% 2,104 17.31% <br /> <br />Driveway 1,024 8.42% 1,277 10.51% <br />Sidewalk/Stoop 181 1.49% 239 1.97% <br />Other 13 .11 % 13 .11 % <br />Total Impervious Coverage 2,998 24.66% 3,633 29.89% <br /> <br />Landscaping Coverage 75.34% 70.11% <br />Lot Size 12,155