Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – April 6, 2016 5 <br /> <br />Senior Planner Bachler discussed the existing and proposed stormwater management system <br />for the site. It was noted that the new system would better manage stormwater runoff for the <br />property. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lambeth commented on the demolition plan for the site. He recommended the <br />grade of the site be watched closely in order for the water to drain properly from the south side of <br />the building. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Bachler noted that a separate grading and erosion control permit would be <br />required from the City. This permit would be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lambeth respected staff’s recommendation regarding the monument sign. <br />However, he questioned if the location of the monument sign was proper. He proposed the sign <br />be located at the northwest corner of the site. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Bachler recommended that the applicant address the proposed location of the <br />monument sign. He noted that the proposed location did conform to the Sign Code requirements <br />for monument sign setbacks from the front and side property lines. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jones agreed it would be safer for vehicular traffic to have the sign more <br />centrally located. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman expressed concern with the reduction in landscape coverage. He <br />feared the B-2 District vision was not being followed for this property. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Bachler reviewed the landscaping plan in further detail and believed the new <br />stormwater management system would be more effective. He understood the pervious area was <br />being reduced, however this was being mitigated by the new trees and perennial plantings <br />proposed for the site. He explained the applicant was requesting flexibility on this point within <br />the PUD and staff found the improved stormwater management system to be a positive for the <br />property. <br /> <br />Commissioner Gehrig discussed the drive-thru window and asked if the City had specific <br />definitions for fast food establishments. He questioned if this included coffee shops. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Bachler responded that the Zoning Code includes a definition for fast food <br />restaurants and that most coffee shops would be classified as a fast food establishment. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jones questioned where the drive-thru would be located. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Bachler reviewed the location of the proposed drive-thru window. He provided <br />further comment on how vehicles would stack at this location. It was noted the proposed site <br />plan could not accommodate the required number of vehicle stacking spaces for a fast food <br />restaurant drive-thru. He added that staff recommended a condition of approval that an <br />amendment to the PUD be required if Arden Square leases or sells the space to a fast food <br />restaurant establishment that would use the drive-thru. <br />