07-25-16-R - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JUNE 27, 2016 11 Councilmember Holmes asked what efforts have been made by the property owners to not encroach on the setbacks. Mr. Jittila indicated this was taken into consideration. He commented on the number of restrictions that were on this property given the fact the home was placed back into the northeast corner of the lot. In order for him to be within the guidelines, the three season porch could only be eight feet wide. He explained that the variance was being requested in order for the porch to be more useable. Councilmember McClung questioned the distance from the rear property line to the trail. Acting Public Works Director Anderson estimated that the trail was only a foot off the property line. Councilmember Holden asked why in staff’s opinion, this property was unique. City Planner Streff commented the location of the home on the lot was unique. He noted the home was built close to the north setback. He believed the trails and wetlands also make the lot unique. Councilmember Holden questioned if the Jittilas were aware of the fact their home was pushed back on the lot when they purchased the property. Mrs. Jittila stated she had lobbied to have the home moved. She indicated all of the other homes in her neighborhood had 40 feet in front. Mr. Jittila commented he really did not know until the stakes were placed on his property. This led him and his wife to lobby to have the home moved. Councilmember Holden reported she did not support the proposed variance. She believed the variance would change the neighborhood. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to deny Planning Case 16-015 for a rear yard setback Variance at 1494 Keithson Drive, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans. Mr. Jittila was surprised by the fact the Council did not see the uniqueness of his property. He discussed the spirit of the City’s variance regulations. It was his opinion that the proposed deck and three season porch would not impact his neighbors given the amount of space between him and the adjacent structures. He expressed frustration with the fact that the Council was proposing to deny his request. Mayor Grant understood the home on this property was pushed back due to the wetland. He questioned if the neighboring properties would be able to see a three-foot difference on the three season porch setback. For this reason, he supported the variance and believed it was warranted.