Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—JUNE 27, 2016 11 <br /> Councilmember Holmes asked what efforts have been made by the property owners to not <br /> encroach on the setbacks. <br /> Mr. Jittila indicated this was taken into consideration. He commented on the number of <br /> restrictions that were on this property given the fact the home was placed back into the northeast <br /> corner of the lot. In order for him to be within the guidelines, the three season porch could only <br /> be eight feet wide. He explained that the variance was being requested in order for the porch to be <br /> more useable. <br /> Councilmember McClung questioned the distance from the rear property line to the trail. <br /> Acting Public Works Director Anderson estimated that the trail was only a foot off the property <br /> line. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked why in staff s opinion, this property was unique. <br /> City Planner Streff commented the location of the home on the lot was unique. He noted the <br /> home was built close to the north setback. He believed the trails and wetlands also make the lot <br /> unique. <br /> Councilmember Holden questioned if the Jittilas were aware of the fact their home was pushed <br /> back on the lot when they purchased the property. <br /> Mrs. Jittila stated she had lobbied to have the home moved. She indicated all of the other homes <br /> in her neighborhood had 40 feet in front. <br /> Mr. Jittila commented he really did not know until the stakes were placed on his property. This <br /> led him and his wife to lobby to have the home moved. <br /> Councilmember Holden reported she did not support the proposed variance. She believed the <br /> variance would change the neighborhood. <br /> MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a <br /> motion to deny Plannine Case 16-015 for a rear yard setback Variance at 1494 <br /> Keithson Drive, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans. <br /> Mr. Jittila was surprised by the fact the Council did not see the uniqueness of his property. He <br /> discussed the spirit of the City's variance regulations. It was his opinion that the proposed deck <br /> and three season porch would not impact his neighbors given the amount of space between him <br /> and the adjacent structures. He expressed frustration with the fact that the Council was proposing <br /> to deny his request. <br /> Mayor Grant understood the home on this property was pushed back due to the wetland. He <br /> questioned if the neighboring properties would be able to see a three-foot difference on the three <br /> season porch setback. For this reason, he supported the variance and believed it was warranted. <br />