Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JULY 25, 2016 4 <br /> <br />Mr. Lindeberg described where noise walls would be constructed south of County Road J. He <br />reviewed the voting and public meeting process that would occur for the noise walls. He reported <br />the current sound wall in front of Arden Manor would remain as is. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden discussed the noise wall at County Road C. She requested further <br />information regarding the noise wall voting process. <br /> <br />Mr. Lindeberg explained those people living between 300 and 500 feet to the freeway would be <br />receiving a ballot for the noise wall voting process. He indicated those living further than 500 feet <br />would not receive a ballot. He described the ballot in further detail with the Council. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant questioned why MnDOT was using a balloting process when this had not been done <br />in the past. <br /> <br />Mr. Lindeberg reported MnDOT has a new noise wall approval process. He described the cost <br />effective measures that must be met in order for a noise wall to be constructed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Wicklund asked who would be paying for the noise wall. <br /> <br />Mr. Lindeberg indicated the noise walls would be covered by MnDOT. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung requested further information regarding the timing or phasing of the <br />project phasing. <br /> <br />Mr. Lindeberg discussed the project phasing with the Council noting southbound I-35W would <br />be completed first. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung understood there would be lane and closures during the four years the <br />project took place; however, he wanted to be sure that Arden Hills’ residents would be able to <br />access I-35W throughout the entire span of the project. <br /> <br />Mr. Lindeberg described the lane closures in further detail but noted MnDOT would be working <br />to maintain access. He discussed the short and long-term ramp closures with the Council. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 7:46 p.m. <br /> <br />Nancy Dunlap, 3923 Rolling Hills Road, expressed concern with the proposed location of the <br />noise walls. She feared that her neighborhood (Valentine Hills) would not have a noise wall <br />because she was more than 350 feet from the freeway. She then described how the freeway noise <br />was amplified off the lake into her neighborhood and feared a concrete freeway would be even <br />noisier than the asphalt roadway. She questioned how the noise wall studies were completed by <br />MnDOT. <br /> <br />Mr. Lindeberg described how MnDOT conducted the noise wall studies. He reported the homes <br />in the Valentine Hills neighborhood were quite far from the freeway and would not realize a <br />benefit from a sound wall. For this reason, MnDOT determined a noise wall would not be <br />effective in this area. <br />