Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City of Arden Hills <br />City Council Meeting for September 12, 2016 <br />P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2016\PC 16-019 - Holiday Station 1920 Hwy 96 - PUD and CUP Amendment\Memos_Reports_16- <br />019 <br /> <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />Additional Review <br /> <br />City Engineer <br />The City Engineer has reviewed the submitted plans and did not have any comments at this time. <br />A Grading and Erosion Control Permit is not required for this project. <br /> <br />Building Official <br />The City Building Official has reviewed the submitted plans and did not have any comments at <br />this time. <br /> <br />Rice Creek Watershed District <br />The Rice Creek Watershed District has reviewed the plans and has determined that a permit is <br />not required for the project. <br /> <br /> <br />Findings of Fact <br /> <br />The Planning Commission reviewed Planning Case 16-019 at their regular meeting on August 3, <br />2016. Minutes from the meeting are included in Attachment E. The Planning Commission offers <br />the following findings of fact for consideration: <br /> <br />1. The applicant has requested approval of a PUD Amendment and CUP Amendment for <br />the property at 1920 West Highway 96. <br />2. A Master PUD was approved for 1920 West Highway 96 in Planning Case #05-013. <br />3. The applicant has proposed constructing a multi-use restroom addition on the north end <br />of the existing convenience store that would measure 15 feet – 4 inches by 19 feet – 4 <br />inches with an area of 296 square feet. <br />4. The proposed addition is in substantial conformance with the Zoning Code. Where the <br />proposed addition is not in conformance with the Zoning Code, the proposal is in <br />conformance with the Master PUD approved for the property in Planning Case #05-013. <br />5. The proposed addition is not expected to impact existing and anticipated traffic and <br />parking conditions. <br />6. The proposed addition will not affect noise, odors, glare, vibration, smoke, dust, air <br />pollution, heat, liquid and solid waste on the property. <br />7. The proposed addition is not expected to significantly impact drainage on the property. <br />8. The proposed addition will not affect the population density on the property. <br />9. The proposed addition is unlikely to significantly affect land values on the subject <br />property or on neighboring properties. <br />10. The park dedication requirement does not apply in this case. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />