My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-26-16-SWS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
09-26-16-SWS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2016 2:49:24 PM
Creation date
9/23/2016 2:40:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo - City Council <br />2017 Proposed Preliminary Budget and Tax Levy <br />5 <br />5 <br /> <br />General Fund Revenues <br />Property Tax Levy 162,515$ <br />License and Permits 81,800 <br />Antenna Rentals 40,000 <br />Plan Check Fees 38,000 <br />Other Misc Adjustments 19,417 <br />341,732$ <br />The PIR transfer was restored to $200,000 per Council directive as referenced above. As per the <br />forecast prepared in 2015 for the EDA operating fund as a result of the funding from the Round <br />Lake Road TIF district expiring, an additional $30,000 in transfers was added and was approved <br />by the EDA on July 25, 2016. <br /> <br />All positions are currently still in the 2017 budget including the Working Foreman in Public <br />Works. <br /> <br />Revenues have largely increased due to <br />increased Antenna Rental revenue and <br />Building Permits and Land Use <br />applications. The chart at the right <br />illustrates the increases. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Issues to Consider <br /> <br />The current budget proposal is a $400,839 increase from the previous year. Public Safety <br />increases are equal to $92,515 of the increase. Salaries and benefits are $92,820 of the increase, <br />but remember all vacant positions and the Working Foreman have been included in this budget. <br />$100,000 has been included for the Comprehensive Plan Update which could be a one-time <br />expenditure. Unless there is a change in personnel and positions, most other increases are going <br />to be on-going operation costs. <br /> <br />Last year the Council balanced the budget using $160,325 in reserves, while we may not have <br />used them as a result of vacancies and better than expected revenues with building permit <br />activity and planning cases, this will not be sustainable in the future if we fill the vacant positions <br />and as we are primarily built out the permit and planning revenue will not be a stable reliable <br />source of revenue. <br /> <br />The budget presented as directed by the City Council shows using $238,324 in reserves to <br />balance the proposed 2017 budget. If we assume that $100,000 of this amount is a one-time <br />expense for the Comprehensive Plan amendment, then the on-going concern is $138,324. This <br />does include the General Fund portion of the Working Foreman position, if this were eliminated <br />the on-going concern would amount to $101,666. To correct this concern in the current <br />proposed budget would mean a levy increase of 7.6% or $264,181. We would then be using <br />$136,658 in reserves for this budget which would be appropriate for one-time expenditures. <br /> <br /> <br />Sample Levy Increases <br /> <br />Staff has prepared a number of tax levy scenarios for discussion in evaluating setting a levy. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.