09-26-16-R - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City of Arden Hills City Council Meeting for September 26, 2016 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2016\PC 16-022 - 1500 Arden Place - Variance\Memos_Reports_16-022 Page 3 of 5 Findings of Fact The Planning Commission reviewed Planning Case 16-022 at their regular meeting on September 7, 2016. Draft minutes from the meeting are included in Attachment J. The Planning Commission offers the following findings of fact for consideration: General Findings: 1. The property at 1500 Arden Place is located in the R-1 Single Family Residential Zoning District. 2. The lot is a conforming lot within the R-1 District. 3. The applicants have proposed taking down the existing dwelling on the property and constructing a new single-family dwelling and accessory storage building. 4. Based on the requirements outlined in Section 1330.03, Subd. 4 of the Zoning Code, the City has determined that the required setback for the new dwelling is 80 feet – 2 inches from the Lake Johanna OHWL. 5. The proposed principal structure would encroach 15 feet – 9 inches into the required setback from the Lake Johanna OHWL, creating a setback of 64 feet – 5 inches. 6. Section 1325.03 of the Zoning Code allows decks to extend up to 6 feet into the required structure setback. Therefore, a deck could be up to 74 feet – 2 inches from the Lake Johanna OHWL. 7. The proposed deck would encroach 15 feet – 4 inches into the setback from the Lake Johanna OHWL, creating a setback of 58 feet – 10 inches. 8. The proposed principal structure would encroach 2 feet into the front yard setback, creating a setback of 38 feet from the Arden Place property line. The minimum front yard setback in the R-1 District is 40 feet. 9. All other aspects of the proposed construction are in conformance with the Zoning Code requirements for the R-1 District. 10. The proposed construction would not encroach on any flood plains, wetlands, or easements. Variance Findings: 11. The variance would be in harmony with the purpose and intent of the City’s Code because the dwelling would be constructed in a location to minimize visual impacts on adjacent properties and protect sight lines of Lake Johanna. 12. The variance would be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan because it meets the City’s housing goal of encouraging property reinvestment that complements and enhances the character of the City’s established neighborhoods. 13. The proposed construction of a new single-family dwelling is a reasonable use of the property that would not be allowed under the rules of the Zoning Code without the requested variance. 14. The property is unique and presents development challenges because of its topography. The unique characteristics of the property were not created by the property owners.