My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-14-16-SWS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
11-14-16-SWS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2016 10:01:57 AM
Creation date
12/30/2016 10:01:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION — NOVEMBER 14, 2016 2 <br />Mr. Zipko discussed other ways he was working to drive members of the community to the open <br />house event. <br />Councilmember Holden requested the brackets be removed from the feedback form. She <br />believed this would make it easier to read. She asked that the font size also be increased. <br />Mayor Grant suggested a question be placed on the feedback form asking residents what they <br />would change versus just asking for general comments. <br />Councilmember McClung believed this was a leading question. <br />Councilmember Holden supported the Mayor's question and wanted to be ensured the City <br />could gather information from the public. She believed that the survey as presented did not <br />address any of her concerns. <br />Mayor Grant suggested the survey contain questions that address both the likes and dislikes <br />within the concept plan. <br />Councilmember Holmes supported Mayor Grant's question being added but believed the <br />remainder of the survey should remain as is. She recommended the question regarding the Civic <br />space be removed due to the fact the City did not have a concept for this area. <br />Stacie Kvilvang, Ehlers, suggested a question be drafted that states: What do you like or dislike <br />about the concept plan. She believed this would address the concerns of the Council. <br />Councilmember Holden wanted to see the survey written in a manner that truly requested <br />feedback and suggestions. <br />Councilmember McClung recommended the order of the questions be reconsidered and <br />suggested the first question read: Do you have any suggestions or recommendations regarding the <br />concept plan. The second question should read: What concerns do you have with the project. The <br />third question was to read: What do you like about the concept plan. <br />Mr. Zipko suggested the third and final question simply read: Other Comments as this would <br />allow for open ended feedback from the public. He recommended the questions read as follows: <br />1. Do you have any suggestions or recommendations regarding the TCAAP concept plan? <br />2. What concerns do you have with the project? <br />3. Other comments <br />Councilmember Holden asked how many people would be able to visit a station at a time at the <br />Open House. <br />Mr. Zipko estimated eight to twelve people would be able to view the stations at any given time <br />and noted there would be six stations at the Open House. He anticipated the discussions at the <br />stations would be very conversational. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.