My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-24-17-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
04-24-17-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2017 11:49:10 AM
Creation date
5/23/2017 11:46:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 24, 2017 7 <br />Mayor Grant requested further information regarding the lighting proposed for the back of the <br />building. <br />Senior Planner Bachler discussed the photometric plan for the site and described the proposed <br />location of lights along the rear of the building. It was noted this elevation of the building would <br />have eight lights. <br />Councilmember Holden stated she had concerns with traffic in this area and asked if staff had <br />spoken with the County regarding Lexington Avenue. She questioned if the roadway could be <br />restriped to add a right turn lane. <br />Senior Planner Bachler explained he spoke with Ramsey County regarding Lexington Avenue. <br />He understood this roadway would be reconstructed in 2020. He noted that Ramsey County was <br />recommending the right turn lane on Red Fox Road be constructed when the larger project was <br />completed. He stated it was his understanding a traffic signal would be added at Lexington <br />Avenue and the Target service road as part of the reconstruction project. <br />Councilmember Holden expressed concern with the rear elevation of the building. <br />Councilmember Scott inquired if there were 19 or 16 conditions of approval. <br />Senior Planner Bachler clarified that the Planning Commission was presented with 19 <br />conditions of approval. Three of these conditions were addressed by the applicant and are <br />reflected in the plans included in the report to the City Council. He explained the <br />recommendation for approval to the City Council now included 16 conditions. <br />Councilmember Holmes asked who would be using the doors along the west fagade. <br />Senior Planner Bachler understood these doors would be use as employee entrance doors or for <br />deliveries. He reported the drive aisle along the west fagade would be one-way. <br />Nick Roberts, Roberts Management Group, thanked the Council for their time and consideration. <br />He also thanked staff for all of their assistance on this plan. He stated it was his goal to do right <br />by the community he was developing in and to construct beautiful buildings. He explained that <br />Phase I of Lexington Station had been a tremendous success and he looked forward to completing <br />Phase II. He appreciated the great discussion the Planning Commission had when reviewing the <br />Phase II plans. <br />Mr. Roberts commented on the proposed wall and monument signage for Phase II of Lexington <br />Station. He believed that it was reasonable to have a slightly larger monument sign in exchange <br />for a reduce amount of wall signage. He requested the endcaps be allowed to have 40 square feet <br />of wall signage on two sides of the building to match the Phase I building. <br />Mr. Roberts discussed the west elevation of the building and noted he was proposing to use a <br />rock faced building material which was an improvement over what was currently in place. He <br />commented on how traffic would flow along the west elevation and noted the doors along the rear <br />of the building would be used for service deliveries. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.