My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-11-12 PC WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
PC Minutes 2012
>
07-11-12 PC WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2017 4:25:05 PM
Creation date
6/6/2017 4:24:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION – JULY 11, 2012 3 <br /> <br /> <br />Commissioner Holewa did not feel it was necessary for the City to regulate the size of the <br />units and that this should be market driven. <br /> <br />Chair Larson agreed stating future buildings would benefit from a variety of unit sizes <br />and not having all unit sizes the same. <br /> <br />Commissioner Thompson commented Arden Hills was unique as it housed two rather <br />expensive colleges and had a need for rental properties. <br /> <br />Commissioner Holewa indicated the security at the apartment complex would be key. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hames stated the building orientation and parking issues would have to be <br />addressed to increase the security. <br /> <br />City Planner Beekman explained that all new apartment buildings would be required to <br />work with the Sheriff’s Department to assist with crime prevention through <br />environmental design. She noted the Holiday Inn redevelopment did propose to have <br />onsite security 24 hours a day. <br /> <br />The Commission then discussed secured entry and access to multi-family dwellings. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes stated the Holiday Inn building was not built for long term <br />residency. If redeveloped into apartments, there were no closet space or proper built-ins. <br />It was her opinion that 300 square feet was too small for an apartment unit. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stodola stated a market study showing what size units were being rented <br />in the community would benefit the City greatly at this point, as it would show the <br />demand for units based on size. <br /> <br />Planning Intern Horton discussed his findings after speaking with several neighboring <br />communities. He explained that some cities had a minimum unit size while others did <br />not. He commented one major difference was the standards between new development <br />and redevelopment. He found no standards that would allow for a 300 square foot <br />efficiency unit. In addition, one city limited the number of efficiency units to 10% within <br />a multi-family complex. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hames recommended the Commission consider drafting language for both <br />new multi-family developments along with standards for the redevelopment of a multi- <br />family property. <br /> <br />City Planner Beekman stated the Code did need to focus on the multi-family needs of the <br />entire City and not just meet the needs of college students. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stodola cautioned the Commission from setting the standards too strict <br />and therefore dictating how a developer shall build a multi-family dwelling in the City of <br />Arden Hills. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.