My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-11-12 PC WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
PC Minutes 2012
>
07-11-12 PC WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2017 4:25:05 PM
Creation date
6/6/2017 4:24:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION – JULY 11, 2012 4 <br /> <br />Chair Larson agreed and recommended staff speaks with Steve Baker regarding this <br />matter. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hames stated the need for rental housing was on the rise and she <br />encouraged the Commission to keep this in mind as the City would have requests for new <br />multi-family dwellings in the near future. <br /> <br />City Planner Beekman stated another option would be to create a PUD process for the <br />redevelopment of a multi-family dwelling. <br /> <br />Chair Larson indicated this would eliminate the need to dictate all guidelines in that each <br />redevelopment could be reviewed on a case by case basis. <br /> <br />Commissioner Holewa was in favor of this as well. <br /> <br />City Planner Beekman stated the City did have limited rental housing opportunities <br />available. She indicated the City would benefit from a variety of unit sizes to meet <br />market demands. She stated that generally speaking, it’s good to avoid large <br />demographic blocks, as this cuts down on a communities ability to weather shifts in the <br />market and provide life cycle housing for its residents. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stodola was in favor of setting an average unit size within multi-family <br />dwellings as this would encourage a more diverse rental population. In addition, she <br />suggested a maximum number of units in a complex also be set. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hames agreed stating a maximum number or percentage of efficiency <br />units should also be set. She then discussed the properties in the City that could be used <br />for future multi-family development. <br /> <br />City Planner Beekman stated the building code does regulate windows and allows them <br />to overlook a courtyard. However, City Code does not define a courtyard. She reported <br />that Holiday Inn was proposing several units overlooking a basketball court. <br /> <br />Chair Larson reviewed some discussions the City of St. Paul was having at this time <br />regarding egress windows. He noted the building code did cover much of these concerns. <br />He stated a glazed opening was required within the code. <br /> <br />City Planner Beekman then requested further information on the parking requirements for <br />multi-family dwellings. <br /> <br />Chair Larson recommended one stall per bedroom be set as a standard. He did not want <br />to see large parking lots built. He was in favor of new construction having structured <br />parking below the buildings. This was a nice upgrade that offered heated parking. He <br />was not in favor of detached garages. <br /> <br />Commissioner Holewa suggested visitor parking be delineated from resident parking. <br /> <br />Community Development Intern Horton stated all cities he spoke with require one <br />enclosed parking space per dwelling.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.